Klun Jerome A, Khrimian Ashot, Debboun Mustapha
USDA-ARS, BA, PSI, Chemical Affecting Insect Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
J Med Entomol. 2006 Jan;43(1):34-9. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0034:radeos]2.0.co;2.
A series of behavioral tests with Aedes aegypti (L.), Anopheles stephensi Liston, mosquitoes, and the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli in the presence of Deet, SS220, and Picaridin topically applied to the skin of human volunteers showed that the insects were deterred from feeding on and repelled from surfaces emanating the compounds. When offered a 12- or 24-cm2 area of skin, one-half treated with compound and one-half untreated, the insects fed almost exclusively on untreated skin. The sand flies and mosquitoes did not at any time physically contact chemically treated surfaces. When treated and untreated skin areas were covered with cloth, insects contacted, landed, and bit only through cloth covering untreated skin. These observations provided evidence that the compounds deterred feeding and repelled insects from treated surfaces primarily as a result of olfactory sensing. When cloth, one-half untreated and one-half treated with chemical, was placed over untreated skin, insects only touched and specifically bit through the untreated cloth. This showed that the activity of the chemicals does not involve a chemical x skin interaction. In the presence of any of the three chemicals, no matter how they were presented to the insects, overall population biting activity was reduced by about one-half relative to controls. This reduction showed a true repellent effect for the compounds. Results clearly showed that Deet, SS220, and Picaridin exert repellent and deterrent effects upon the behavior of mosquitoes and sand flies. Heretofore, the combined behavioral effects of these compounds upon mosquito and sand fly behavior were unknown. Moreover, protection afforded by Deet, SS220, and Picaridin against the feeding of these three disease vectors on humans is mechanistically a consequence of the two chemical effects.
在将避蚊胺、SS220和派卡瑞丁局部涂抹于人类志愿者皮肤的情况下,对埃及伊蚊、斯氏按蚊和巴氏白蛉进行了一系列行为测试。结果表明,这些昆虫会被散发这些化合物的表面所阻止取食并被驱离。当提供一块12平方厘米或24平方厘米的皮肤区域,其中一半用化合物处理,一半未处理时,昆虫几乎只在未处理的皮肤上取食。白蛉和蚊子在任何时候都不会与经化学处理的表面发生物理接触。当处理过和未处理的皮肤区域用布覆盖时,昆虫只会通过覆盖未处理皮肤的布进行接触、降落和叮咬。这些观察结果证明,这些化合物主要通过嗅觉感知来阻止昆虫在处理过的表面取食并驱离昆虫。当一块一半未处理、一半经化学处理的布覆盖在未处理的皮肤上时,昆虫只会接触并专门通过未处理的布进行叮咬。这表明这些化学物质的作用不涉及化学物质与皮肤的相互作用。在存在这三种化学物质中的任何一种的情况下,无论它们如何呈现给昆虫,总体群体叮咬活动相对于对照组都减少了约一半。这种减少表明这些化合物具有真正的驱避作用。结果清楚地表明,避蚊胺、SS220和派卡瑞丁对蚊子和白蛉的行为具有驱避和威慑作用。在此之前,这些化合物对蚊子和白蛉行为的综合行为影响尚不清楚。此外,避蚊胺、SS220和派卡瑞丁对这三种病媒叮咬人类的防护作用在机制上是这两种化学作用的结果。