Voigt Andrew, Barrington William, Ngwu Ogundu, Jain Sandeep, Saba Samir
Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2006 Feb;29(2):74-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960290208.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has recently emerged as a new modality for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure (HF).
Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial and ventricular arrhythmia burdens.
We analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent an upgrade from a dual-chamber to a biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) at a tertiary care center.
Nineteen patients (age 67 +/- 10 years, 18 men, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction 0.24 +/- 0.07) underwent an upgrade to CRT-ICD. The LV lead was placed in a lateral position in 11, posterolateral in 4, and anterolateral in 3 patients. Baseline New York Heart Association class of HF improved in 11 (58%) patients who were considered "responders." After adjusting for the duration of follow-up before and after the upgrade, the number of patients receiving any ICD therapy decreased significantly from 13 to 4 (p = 0.004) and the total number of therapies decreased from 72 to 17 (p = 0.067). Also, the number of detections of sustained ventricular arrhythmias decreased from 40 to 11 episodes (p = 0.05), but the decrease in the number of detected supraventricular arrhythmias and mode switch episodes was not significant. The reduction in the ventricular arrhythmia load was independent of whether or not the patient responded to CRT.
Our data suggest that CRT reduces ventricular but not atrial arrhythmia burden in patients with HF irrespective of their clinical response. This suggests that the reduction in arrhythmia is primarily an electrical phenomenon. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to uncover their underlying mechanisms.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)最近已成为治疗晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者的一种新方法。
心脏再同步治疗可减轻心房和心室心律失常负担。
我们分析了在一家三级医疗中心接受从双腔植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)升级为双心室ICD治疗的患者的临床数据。
19例患者(年龄67±10岁,18例男性,左心室[LV]射血分数0.24±0.07)接受了CRT-ICD升级治疗。11例患者的左心室导线置于外侧位置,4例置于后外侧,3例置于前外侧。11例(58%)被视为“有反应者”的患者纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心力衰竭分级在基线时有所改善。在调整升级前后的随访时间后,接受任何ICD治疗的患者数量从13例显著减少至4例(p = 0.004),治疗总数从72次减少至17次(p = 0.067)。此外,持续性室性心律失常的检测次数从40次减少至11次(p = 0.05),但检测到的室上性心律失常次数和模式转换次数的减少并不显著。室性心律失常负荷的降低与患者是否对CRT有反应无关。
我们的数据表明,无论临床反应如何,CRT均可减轻HF患者的室性心律失常负担,但不能减轻房性心律失常负担。这表明心律失常的减少主要是一种电现象。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现并揭示其潜在机制。