Suppr超能文献

伴侣动物临床诊疗过程中兽医与客户及患宠之间的沟通模式。

Veterinarian-client-patient communication patterns used during clinical appointments in companion animal practice.

作者信息

Shaw Jane R, Bonnett Brenda N, Adams Cindy L, Roter Debra L

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Mar 1;228(5):714-21. doi: 10.2460/javma.228.5.714.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify communication patterns used by veterinarians during clinical appointments in companion animal practice.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

A random sample of 50 companion animal practitioners in southern Ontario and a convenience sample of 300 clients and their pets.

PROCEDURE

For each practitioner, 6 clinical appointments (3 wellness appointments and 3 appointments related to a health problem) were videotaped. The Roter interaction analysis system was used to analyze the resulting 300 videotapes, and cluster analysis was used to identify veterinarian communication patterns.

RESULTS

175 (58%) appointments were classified as having a biomedical communication pattern, and 125 (42%) were classified as having a biolifestyle-social communication pattern. None were classified as having a consumerist communication pattern. Twentythree (46%) veterinarians were classified as using a predominantly biomedical communication pattern, 19 (38%) were classified as using a mixed communication pattern, and 8 (16%) were classified as using a predominantly biolifestyle-social communication pattern. Pattern use was related to the type of appointment. Overall, 103 (69%) wellness appointments were classified as biolifestyle-social and 127 (85%) problem appointments were classified as biomedical. Appointments with a biomedical communication pattern (mean, 11.98 minutes) were significantly longer than appointments with a biolifestyle-social communication pattern (10.43 minutes). Median relationship-centered care score (ie, the ratio of client-centered talk to veterinarian-centered talk) was significantly higher during appointments with a biolifestyle-social communication pattern (1.10) than during appointments with a biomedical communication pattern (0.40).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggest that veterinarians in companion animal practice use 2 distinct patterns of communication. Communication pattern was associated with duration of visit, type of appointment, and relationship-centeredness. Recognition of these communication patterns has implications for veterinary training and client and patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定兽医在伴侣动物诊疗过程中的沟通模式。

设计

横断面描述性研究。

样本总体

安大略省南部50名伴侣动物从业者的随机样本以及300名客户及其宠物的便利样本。

程序

为每位从业者的6次临床诊疗(3次健康检查诊疗和3次与健康问题相关的诊疗)进行录像。使用罗特互动分析系统对由此产生的300份录像带进行分析,并采用聚类分析来确定兽医的沟通模式。

结果

175次(58%)诊疗被归类为具有生物医学沟通模式,125次(42%)被归类为具有生物生活方式 - 社会沟通模式。没有诊疗被归类为具有消费主义沟通模式。23名(46%)兽医被归类为主要使用生物医学沟通模式,19名(38%)被归类为使用混合沟通模式,8名(16%)被归类为主要使用生物生活方式 - 社会沟通模式。模式的使用与诊疗类型有关。总体而言,103次(69%)健康检查诊疗被归类为生物生活方式 - 社会模式,127次(85%)问题诊疗被归类为生物医学模式。具有生物医学沟通模式的诊疗(平均11.98分钟)显著长于具有生物生活方式 - 社会沟通模式的诊疗(10.43分钟)。在具有生物生活方式 - 社会沟通模式的诊疗期间,以关系为中心的护理得分中位数(即客户主导谈话与兽医主导谈话的比率)(1.10)显著高于具有生物医学沟通模式的诊疗期间(0.40)。

结论及临床意义

结果表明,伴侣动物诊疗中的兽医使用两种不同的沟通模式。沟通模式与就诊时长、诊疗类型以及以关系为中心的程度相关。认识到这些沟通模式对兽医培训以及客户和患者的治疗结果具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验