Kärrholm Jenny, Ekholm Karolina, Jakobsson Björn, Ekholm Jan, Bergroth Alf, Schüldt Kristina
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Apr 15;28(7):457-67. doi: 10.1080/09638280500198063.
The present aim was to evaluate the effect of systematic multi-professional co-ordinated rehabilitation (the Stockholm Co-operation Project) on the number of days' sick leave during the first and second half-years after the rehabilitation co-ordination period, compared to the year before. Another aim was to evaluate the economic effects at national level.
A matched-pairs design was used. The study group was based on 64 rehabilitees employed by a public employer in Stockholm, who took part in a systematic multi-professional co-operation project. To obtain pairs, the 64 individuals were individually matched with 64 people who received conventionally organised rehabilitation. Thus, there were 128 subjects altogether.
The study group had substantially less sick leave days per month than the comparison group during the second half-year after the rehabilitation co-ordination period. The effect was even greater in a subgroup with more previous sick leave. During the first half-year after the intervention the comparison group had relatively more sick leave. No effect was found for a subgroup with less previous sick leave. The economic benefit of the intervention was estimated to 1,278 euros per month and person based on the whole group, and to 2,405 euros per month and person based on those with more sick leave.
People who undergo co-ordinated rehabilitation have more working days after the intervention period than those with conventional rehabilitation. This way for rehabilitation actors to co-operate gives better outcomes for rehabilitation cases with long previous sick leave, but not for cases with less previous sick leave. It also generates economic gains at several levels.
当前的目标是评估系统性多专业协作康复(斯德哥尔摩合作项目)在康复协调期后的上半年和下半年与前一年相比对病假天数的影响。另一个目标是评估国家层面的经济影响。
采用配对设计。研究组基于斯德哥尔摩一家公共雇主雇佣的64名康复者,他们参与了一个系统性多专业合作项目。为了形成配对,将这64个人分别与64名接受传统组织康复的人进行匹配。因此,总共有128名受试者。
在康复协调期后的下半年,研究组每月的病假天数明显少于对照组。在病假记录较多的亚组中,这种效果更为明显。在干预后的上半年,对照组的病假相对较多。在病假记录较少的亚组中未发现效果。基于整个组,干预的经济效益估计为每人每月1278欧元,基于病假较多的人,为每人每月2405欧元。
接受协作康复的人在干预期后比接受传统康复的人有更多的工作日。这种康复参与者的合作方式对于病假记录较长的康复案例能产生更好的效果,但对于病假记录较少的案例则不然。它还在多个层面产生经济效益。