National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Jun;22(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9337-x.
To bring people with complex medical, social and vocational needs back to the labour market, interorganizational cooperation is often needed. Yet, studies of processes and strategies for achieving sustainable interorganizational cooperation are sparse. The aim of this study was to analyse the implementation processes of Swedish legislation on financial coordination, with specific focus on different strategies for and perspectives on implementing interorganizational cooperation.
A multiple-case study was used, where two local associations for financial coordination were studied in order to elucidate and compare the development of cooperative work in two settings. The material, collected during a 3-year period, consisted of documents, individual interviews with managers, and focus groups with officials.
Two different implementation strategies were identified. In case 1, a linear strategy was used to implement cooperative projects, which led to difficulties in maintaining cooperative work forms due to a fragmented and time-limited implementation process. In case 2, an interactive strategy was used, where managers and politicians were continuously involved in developing a central cooperation team that became a central part of a developing structure for interorganizational cooperation. An interactive cooperation strategy with long-term joint financing was here shown to be successful in overcoming organizational barriers to cooperation.
It is suggested that a strategy based on adaptation to local conditions, flexibility and constant evaluation is preferred for developing sustainable interorganizational cooperation when implementing policies or legislation affecting interorganizational relationships.
为了使那些具有复杂医疗、社会和职业需求的人重返劳动力市场,通常需要进行组织间的合作。然而,关于实现可持续组织间合作的过程和策略的研究却很少。本研究的目的是分析瑞典关于财务协调的立法的实施过程,特别关注实现组织间合作的不同策略和观点。
采用了多案例研究方法,研究了两个地方的财务协调协会,以阐明和比较两个环境中合作工作的发展。在 3 年期间收集的材料包括文件、经理的个人访谈以及官员的焦点小组。
确定了两种不同的实施策略。在案例 1 中,采用了线性策略来实施合作项目,由于实施过程碎片化且限时,导致合作工作形式难以维持。在案例 2 中,采用了互动策略,经理和政治家不断参与开发一个中央合作团队,该团队成为组织间合作发展结构的核心部分。事实证明,互动合作策略和长期联合融资成功克服了合作的组织障碍。
建议在实施影响组织间关系的政策或法规时,基于适应本地条件、灵活性和不断评估的策略更有利于发展可持续的组织间合作。