Bacong Adrian Matias, Hing Anna K, Morey Brittany, Crespi Catherine M, Kabamalan Maria Midea, Lee Nanette R, Wang May C, de Castro A B, Gee Gilbert C
University of California-Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000324. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
Studies of migration and health focus on a "healthy migrant effect" whereby migrants are healthier than individuals not migrating. Health selection remains the popular explanation of this phenomenon. However, studies are mixed on whether selection occurs and typically examine migrants post-departure. This study used a novel pre-migration dataset to identify which health and social domains differ between migrants and their non-migrant counterparts and their contribution to explaining variance in self-rated health by migrant status at pre-migration and 1-year later. Data were used from the baseline and 1-year follow-up of the Health of Philippine Emigrants Study (HoPES). We used multivariable ordinary least squares regression to examine differences in self-rated health between migrants to the U.S. and a comparable group of non-migrants at baseline (premigration) and one year later, accounting for seven domains: physical health, mental health, health behavior, demographics, socioeconomic factors and healthcare utilization, psychosocial factors, and social desirability. A migrant advantage was present for self-rated health at baseline and 1-year. Accounting for all domains, migrants reported better self-rated health compared to non-migrants both at baseline (β = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.22, 0.43) and at 1-year (β = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.46). Migrant status, health behavior, and mental health accounted for most of the variance in self-rated health both at baseline and 1-year follow-up. This analysis provides evidence of migrant health selection and nuanced understanding to what is being captured by self-rated health in studies of migrant health that should be considered in future research.
移民与健康研究聚焦于“健康移民效应”,即移民比未移民的个体更健康。健康选择仍然是对这一现象的普遍解释。然而,关于是否存在选择的研究结果不一,且通常是在移民离开后进行考察。本研究使用了一个全新的移民前数据集,以确定移民与其非移民同龄人在哪些健康和社会领域存在差异,以及这些差异对解释移民前和一年后根据移民身份自评健康状况的方差有何贡献。数据来自菲律宾移民健康研究(HoPES)的基线调查和一年随访。我们使用多变量普通最小二乘法回归来检验前往美国的移民与一组可比的非移民在基线(移民前)和一年后的自评健康差异,考虑了七个领域:身体健康、心理健康、健康行为、人口统计学、社会经济因素和医疗保健利用、心理社会因素以及社会期望性。在基线和一年时,自评健康方面存在移民优势。考虑所有领域后,移民在基线时(β = 0.32;95%置信区间 = 0.22, 0.43)和一年时(β = 0.28;95%置信区间 = 0.10, 0.46)报告的自评健康状况均优于非移民。移民身份、健康行为和心理健康在基线和一年随访时解释了自评健康差异的大部分。该分析为移民健康选择提供了证据,并对移民健康研究中自评健康所反映的情况有了细致入微的理解,这在未来研究中应予以考虑。