Suppr超能文献

格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分且双侧瞳孔固定散大的创伤患者有存活的可能吗?

Do trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils have any chance of survival?

作者信息

Tien Homer C, Cunha Josue R F, Wu Sergio N, Chughtai Talat, Tremblay Lorraine N, Brenneman Fred D, Rizoli Sandro B

机构信息

Trauma Program and the Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):274-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197177.13379.f4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) and pupillary status predict poor outcomes in head injury (HI) patients. We compared the mortality of GCS 3 patients having bilateral fixed and dilated pupils (BFDP) with GCS 3 patients having reactive pupils (RP). We then determined if trauma system or patient factors were responsible for the difference in mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed all adult, blunt HI patients with GCS=3, admitted to our institution from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003. Demographics, injury data, prehospital times, procedures, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

During this period, 245 patients were admitted with GCS of 3, and met inclusion criteria. In all, 173 patients were analyzed, after excluding 23 patients who were dead-on-arrival, and 45 others, who were intoxicated with alcohol, or received paralytic agents in the trauma room. All BFDP patients died, whereas 42.0% of reactive pupil (RP) patients died (p < 0.0001). With regards to patient factors, BFDP patients were more likely to be unstable, have extra-axial bleeding, and evidence of midline shift and/or herniation. Trauma system factors, however, may also have had an impact on outcome. Despite having more extra-axial bleeding, BFDP patients were less likely to have a neurosurgical operation than RP patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GCS of 3 and BFDP have a dismal prognosis. These patients have suffered devastating brain injuries and tend to be hemodynamically unstable. Clinicians, however, are less likely to aggressively treat BFDP patients than RP patients. Further prospective studies are required to determine which patients with GCS of 3 and BFDP are likely to benefit from aggressive treatment.

摘要

背景

低格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分和瞳孔状态可预测颅脑损伤(HI)患者的不良预后。我们比较了双侧瞳孔固定散大(BFDP)的GCS 3分患者与瞳孔反应性正常(RP)的GCS 3分患者的死亡率。然后我们确定创伤系统或患者因素是否是死亡率差异的原因。

方法

我们回顾了2001年1月1日至2003年12月31日期间入住我院的所有GCS = 3分的成年钝性HI患者。记录人口统计学、损伤数据、院前时间、治疗措施和结局。

结果

在此期间,245例GCS为3分的患者入院并符合纳入标准。排除23例到达时已死亡的患者以及45例在创伤室中酒精中毒或接受麻痹剂治疗的患者后,共分析了173例患者。所有BFDP患者均死亡,而42.0%的瞳孔反应性正常(RP)患者死亡(p < 0.0001)。关于患者因素,BFDP患者更可能不稳定,有轴外出血以及中线移位和/或脑疝的证据。然而,创伤系统因素也可能对结局产生影响。尽管BFDP患者轴外出血更多,但与RP患者相比,他们接受神经外科手术的可能性较小。

结论

GCS为3分且双侧瞳孔固定散大的患者预后不佳。这些患者遭受了毁灭性的脑损伤,并且往往血流动力学不稳定。然而,与RP患者相比,临床医生对BFDP患者进行积极治疗的可能性较小。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定哪些GCS为3分且双侧瞳孔固定散大的患者可能从积极治疗中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验