Harvey Philip W, Everett David J
Toxicology Department, Covance Laboratories Ltd, Otley Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 1PY, UK.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Mar;20(1):145-65. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2005.09.008.
Regulation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals is reviewed in terms of hazard assessment (regulatory toxicology) and risk assessment. The current range of regulatory general toxicology protocols can detect endocrine toxicity, but specific endocrine toxicology tests are required to confirm mechanisms (e.g. oestrogenic, anti-androgenic). Strategies for validating new endocrine toxicology protocols and approaches to data assessment are discussed, and deficiencies in regulatory toxicology testing (e.g. lack of adrenocortical function assessment) identified. Recent evidence of a role of prolactin in human breast cancer also highlights deficiencies in regulatory evaluation. Actual human exposure to chemicals and the high-exposure example of chemicals in body-care cosmetics is reviewed with reference to evidence that common ingredients (e.g. parabens, cyclosiloxanes) are oestrogenic. The hypothesis and epidemiology concerning chemical exposure from body-care cosmetics (moisturizers, lotions, sun screens, deodorants) and breast cancer in women is reviewed, applying Bradford-Hill criteria for association and causality, and research requirements are identified.
从危害评估(监管毒理学)和风险评估的角度对内分泌干扰化学物质的监管进行了综述。当前一系列监管通用毒理学方案能够检测内分泌毒性,但需要特定的内分泌毒理学试验来确认作用机制(如雌激素作用、抗雄激素作用)。讨论了验证新的内分泌毒理学方案的策略以及数据评估方法,并指出了监管毒理学检测中的不足之处(如缺乏肾上腺皮质功能评估)。催乳素在人类乳腺癌中作用的最新证据也凸显了监管评估中的不足。结合常见成分(如对羟基苯甲酸酯、环硅氧烷)具有雌激素作用的证据,对人体实际接触化学物质以及身体护理化妆品中化学物质的高暴露实例进行了综述。运用布拉德福德-希尔关联和因果关系标准,对关于女性身体护理化妆品(保湿霜、乳液、防晒霜、除臭剂)中的化学物质暴露与乳腺癌的假说和流行病学进行了综述,并确定了研究需求。