• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在随机多中心III期试验(FFCD 9102)中使用斯皮策生活质量指数的比较性纵向生活质量研究:局部晚期可切除胸段食管鳞癌患者中,放化疗后手术与单纯放化疗的对比。

A comparative longitudinal quality of life study using the Spitzer quality of life index in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102): chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced squamous resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Michel P, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz J-F, Paillot B, Arveux P, Milan C, Bedenne L

机构信息

Féderation Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Faculty of Medicine, 7 Boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, 21079 Dijon Cedex, France.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2006 May;17(5):827-34. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl033. Epub 2006 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdl033
PMID:16524973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the longitudinal quality of life (QoL) between chemoradiation with or without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous resectable esophageal cancer included in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with locally advanced resectable (T3-4 N0-1 M0) epidermoid or glandular esophageal cancer (n = 451) received induction chemoradiation. Responders (n = 259) were randomized between surgery (arm A) and continuation of chemoradiation (arm B). The Spitzer QoL Index was scored (0-10) at inclusion and at each follow-up, every 3 months during 2 years. QoL at baseline and longitudinal changes were respectively compared with univariate ANOVA and mixed-model analysis of variance for repeated measurements. The time interval between the follow-up was assessed and the same analyses were performed among survivors with 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The squamous histology was predominant in both arms. The mean QoL score decreased between baseline and the first follow-up and between the first and the second follow-ups. QoL scores at the first follow-up were comparatively worse in arm A than in arm B (7.52 versus 8.45, P < 0.01), whereas the longitudinal QoL study showed no difference between treatments (adjusted P = 0.26). Furthermore, the longitudinal QoL was not different (adjusted P = 0.23) among survivors with 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients responding to induction chemoradiation, surgery and continuation of chemoradiation had the same impact on QoL in patients with locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer although a significantly greater decrease in the Spitzer Index was observed in the postoperative period.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是在一项随机多中心III期试验(FFCD 9102)纳入的局部晚期可切除鳞状食管癌患者中,比较放化疗联合或不联合手术治疗后的纵向生活质量(QoL)。

材料与方法

所有局部晚期可切除(T3-4 N0-1 M0)的表皮样或腺性食管癌患者(n = 451)均接受诱导放化疗。缓解者(n = 259)被随机分为手术组(A组)和继续放化疗组(B组)。在入组时以及随后2年中每3个月的每次随访时,使用斯皮策生活质量指数进行评分(0-10分)。分别采用单因素方差分析和重复测量的混合模型方差分析,比较基线时的生活质量和纵向变化。评估随访之间的时间间隔,并在随访2年的幸存者中进行相同的分析。

结果

两组中鳞状组织学类型均占主导。从基线到第一次随访以及从第一次到第二次随访期间,平均生活质量评分均下降。第一次随访时,A组的生活质量评分相对低于B组(7.52对8.45,P < 0.01),而纵向生活质量研究显示治疗组之间无差异(校正P = 0.26)。此外,随访2年的幸存者之间纵向生活质量也无差异(校正P = 0.23)。

结论

在诱导放化疗有效的患者中,手术和继续放化疗对局部晚期可切除食管癌患者的生活质量影响相同,尽管术后斯皮策指数有明显更大幅度的下降。

相似文献

1
A comparative longitudinal quality of life study using the Spitzer quality of life index in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102): chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced squamous resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.一项在随机多中心III期试验(FFCD 9102)中使用斯皮策生活质量指数的比较性纵向生活质量研究:局部晚期可切除胸段食管鳞癌患者中,放化疗后手术与单纯放化疗的对比。
Ann Oncol. 2006 May;17(5):827-34. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl033. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
2
CMISG1701: a multicenter prospective randomized phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (cTNM) (NCT03001596).CMISG1701:一项多中心前瞻性随机III期临床试验,比较新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术在局部晚期可切除食管鳞状细胞癌(cTNM)患者中的疗效(NCT03001596)。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3446-7.
3
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS).新辅助放化疗后手术与单纯手术治疗食管腺癌或鳞癌患者的比较(CROSS研究)
BMC Surg. 2008 Nov 26;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-21.
4
Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102.与单纯放化疗相比,放化疗后手术治疗食管鳞癌:FFCD 9102研究
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 1;25(10):1160-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7118.
5
Early surgery for failure after chemoradiation in operable thoracic oesophageal cancer. Analysis of the non-randomised patients in FFCD 9102 phase III trial: Chemoradiation followed by surgery versus chemoradiation alone.可切除性胸段食管癌放化疗后失败的早期手术。FFCD 9102 三期临床试验中未随机分组患者的分析:手术继以放化疗与单纯放化疗的比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1683-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.027. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma.局部晚期食管癌患者术前放化疗与单纯手术的随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):305-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.305.
7
Esophagectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional control in clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients.同步放化疗后行食管癌切除术可改善临床II期或III期食管癌患者的局部区域控制。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.056.
8
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer.手术治疗的食管癌患者的新辅助放化疗
Acta Oncol. 2001;40(5):558-65. doi: 10.1080/028418601750444088.
9
Phase II evaluation of preoperative chemoradiation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.食管癌鳞状细胞癌和腺癌术前放化疗及术后辅助化疗的II期评估
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):868-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.868.
10
A phase II trial of preoperative combined-modality therapy for localized esophageal carcinoma: initial results.局部食管癌术前综合治疗的II期试验:初步结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Aug;124(2):270-7. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.122545.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes following esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后患者报告的结局
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):7132-7142. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-487. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Health-related quality of life assessment among patients with oesophageal cancer at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.埃塞俄比亚提库尔·安贝萨专科医院食管癌患者的健康相关生活质量评估:一项横断面研究。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Jan 18;18:1656. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1656. eCollection 2024.
3
Recent Progress in the Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
局部晚期食管癌新辅助治疗策略的最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;13(20):5162. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205162.
4
Post-Neoadjuvant Surveillance and Surgery as Needed Compared with Post-Neoadjuvant Surgery on Principle in Multimodal Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review.食管癌多模式治疗中按需进行新辅助治疗后的监测与手术与原则上新辅助治疗后手术的比较:一项范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;13(3):429. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030429.
5
Cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy versus chemoradiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.放化疗序贯手术与单纯放化疗治疗食管鳞癌的成本效果分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):440-446. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2721. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
ERAS and patient reported outcomes in thoracic surgery: a review of current data.胸外科手术中的加速康复外科(ERAS)与患者报告结局:当前数据综述
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 7):S976-S986. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.08.
7
Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis.放化疗后胸段食管癌的临床完全缓解:是否一定要行手术切除?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Dec;9(12):1638-1647. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12874. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery.心胸外科患者报告结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan;107(1):294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005.
9
Quality of life assessment in esophagectomy patients.食管癌切除术患者的生活质量评估
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Feb;6(4):84. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.38.
10
Serum microRNA-193b as a promising biomarker for prediction of chemoradiation sensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.血清微小RNA-193b作为预测食管鳞状细胞癌患者放化疗敏感性的一种有前景的生物标志物。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Mar;15(3):3273-3280. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7698. Epub 2017 Dec 27.