Vilos George A, Newton David W, Odell Roger C, Abu-Rafea Basim, Vilos Angelos G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.12.001.
To determine patterns and range of stray radiofrequency (RF) currents flowing through the working element of monopolar resectoscopes during routine endometrial rollerball ablation or resection; and to determine whether straightforward modifications of the uterine resectoscope and the application of RF monitoring could provide a safe pathway for such currents.
Prospective in vivo measurements (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
University-affiliated teaching hospital.
Twelve women undergoing resectoscopic surgery.
During routine resectoscopic surgery using 1.5% glycine irrigant solution, three modified 26F Storz resectoscope working elements (model 27070E) were adapted to be continuously monitored with an Encision AEM device for excessive capacitive coupling and other stray currents from insulation failure. Active electrodes used were 3 mm and 5 mm rollberballs and 8 mm-diameter cutting loops powered by ERBE or Valleylab generators at 120 W. Active and working element currents were monitored by Pearson current transformers followed by root-mean-squared detectors based on the Analog Devices AD-637 integrated circuit. Data were recorded using a Fluke 199C oscilloscope, then serially transferred to a notebook computer and analyzed using Flukeview, Excel, and Minitab software.
Typical values of working element currents ranged from 0.10 to 0.20 A. Active electrode currents were typically in the range of 0.50 to 1.10 A. Frequently, the working element current exceeded the typical values and ranged up to 0.60 A. These current surges produced a heat factor (I(2)t) of 0.45 A(2).sec in a 10-second period.
During resectoscopic electrosurgery, baseline, most likely capacitive coupled, currents were always present. In addition, high values of working element currents occurred frequently, and they surged up to 0.60 A for significant periods of time. Without the modification of the resectoscopic device, these currents have the capability of flowing through the patient's genital tract and causing burns. Since monopolar electrosurgery remains an integral part of most hysteroscopic procedures, active electrode monitoring may offer a solution in protecting the patient and the surgeon from stray electrosurgical burns.
确定在常规子宫内膜滚球消融或切除过程中,流经单极电切镜工作元件的杂散射频(RF)电流的模式和范围;并确定对子宫电切镜进行直接改进以及应用射频监测是否能为这些电流提供安全路径。
前瞻性体内测量(加拿大工作组分类II - 1)。
大学附属医院教学医院。
12名接受电切镜手术的女性。
在使用1.5%甘氨酸灌洗液进行常规电切镜手术期间,对三个改良的26F史托斯电切镜工作元件(型号27070E)进行适配,以便使用Encision AEM设备连续监测是否存在过度电容耦合以及绝缘故障产生的其他杂散电流。使用的有源电极是3毫米和5毫米的滚球以及直径8毫米的切割环,由ERBE或威力雅实验室发生器以120瓦功率供电。有源电极电流和工作元件电流由皮尔逊电流互感器监测,随后基于模拟器件AD - 637集成电路的均方根检测器进行检测。数据使用福禄克199C示波器记录,然后串行传输到笔记本电脑,并使用福禄克视图、Excel和Minitab软件进行分析。
工作元件电流的典型值范围为0.10至0.20安。有源电极电流通常在0.50至1.10安范围内。工作元件电流经常超过典型值,范围高达0.60安。这些电流浪涌在10秒内产生的热因子(I²t)为0.45安²·秒。
在电切镜电外科手术期间,基线电流(很可能是电容耦合电流)始终存在。此外,工作元件电流的高值频繁出现,并且在相当长的时间内飙升至0.60安。如果不对电切镜设备进行改进,这些电流有可能流经患者生殖道并造成灼伤。由于单极电外科手术仍是大多数宫腔镜手术不可或缺的一部分,有源电极监测可能为保护患者和外科医生免受杂散电外科灼伤提供一种解决方案。