Colacurci Nicola, De Franciscis Pasquale, Mollo Antonio, Litta Pietro, Perino Antonio, Cobellis Luigi, De Placido Giuseppe
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Sciences, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.010.
To compare 2 procedures for metroplasty: resectoscopy with monopolar knife versus small-diameter hysteroscopy fitted with a Versapoint device.
Prospective randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I).
Endoscopic gynecology units at tertiary care university hospitals.
One hundred-sixty patients with septate uterus and a history of recurrent abortion or primary infertility undergoing hysteroscopic metroplasty from 2001 to 2005.
Hysteroscopic resection of the uterine septum performed with either a 26F resectoscope with unipolar knife (80 women, group A) or a 5-mm diameter hysteroscope with Versapoint device (80 women, group B). All patients were managed expectantly, with follow-up lasting 1 year.
Operative parameters (operative time, fluid absorption, complications, need for second intervention) and reproductive outcome parameters (pregnancy, abortion, term and preterm delivery, modality of delivery, cervical cerclage) were measured. Operative time and fluid absorption were significantly greater in group A than in group B (23.4 +/- 5.7 vs 16.9 +/- 4.7 minutes and 486.4 +/- 170.0 vs 222.1 +/- 104.9 mL, respectively). The cumulative complication rate was significantly lower in group B than in group A. No difference in any of the reproductive parameters was observed between the 2 groups: pregnancy and delivery rates were 70% and 81.6% in group A vs 76.9% and 84% in group B. Nine women (18.4%) from group B and 8 women (16%) from group B experienced spontaneous abortions. Most patients (54/82) delivered by cesarean section without differences according to the hysteroscopic technique used for metroplasty (65% in group A vs 67.7% in group B) or to the gestational age (65.1% of term and 68.7% of preterm deliveries).
Small-diameter hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode for the incision of uterine septum is as effective as resectoscopy with unipolar electrode regarding reproductive outcome and is associated with shorter operating time and lower complication rate.
比较两种子宫成形术的方法:单极电刀宫腔镜切除术与配备Versapoint设备的小直径宫腔镜手术。
前瞻性随机研究(加拿大工作组分类I级)。
三级护理大学医院的内镜妇科病房。
2001年至2005年间,160例患有纵隔子宫且有反复流产史或原发性不孕症的患者接受宫腔镜子宫成形术。
使用26F单极电刀宫腔镜(80例女性,A组)或配备Versapoint设备的5毫米直径宫腔镜(80例女性,B组)进行宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术。所有患者均进行观察性处理,随访持续1年。
测量手术参数(手术时间、液体吸收量、并发症、二次干预需求)和生殖结局参数(妊娠、流产、足月和早产、分娩方式、宫颈环扎)。A组的手术时间和液体吸收量显著高于B组(分别为23.4±5.7分钟对16.9±4.7分钟,486.4±170.0毫升对222.1±104.9毫升)。B组的累积并发症发生率显著低于A组。两组在任何生殖参数上均未观察到差异:A组的妊娠率和分娩率分别为70%和81.6%,B组为76.9%和84%。B组有9名女性(18.4%)和A组有8名女性(16%)发生自然流产。大多数患者(54/82)通过剖宫产分娩,无论采用何种宫腔镜技术进行子宫成形术(A组为65%,B组为67.7%)或孕周(足月分娩的65.1%和早产的68.7%)均无差异。
使用双极电极的小直径宫腔镜进行子宫纵隔切开术在生殖结局方面与使用单极电极的宫腔镜切除术一样有效,且手术时间更短,并发症发生率更低。