• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在克服临床惰性并改善基层医疗环境中糖尿病控制情况的干预措施:改善非裔美国人糖尿病的基层医疗(IPCAAD)8。

An intervention to overcome clinical inertia and improve diabetes mellitus control in a primary care setting: Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) 8.

作者信息

Ziemer David C, Doyle Joyce P, Barnes Catherine S, Branch William T, Cook Curtiss B, El-Kebbi Imad M, Gallina Daniel L, Kolm Paul, Rhee Mary K, Phillips Lawrence S

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Health Systems, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):507-13. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.507.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.5.507
PMID:16534036
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although clinical trials have shown that proper management of diabetes can improve outcomes, and treatment guidelines are widespread, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in the United States are rising. Since process measures are improving, poor glycemic control may reflect the failure of health care providers to intensify diabetes therapy when indicated--clinical inertia. We asked whether interventions aimed at health care provider behavior could overcome this barrier and improve glycemic control.

METHODS

In a 3-year trial, 345 internal medicine residents were randomized to be controls or to receive computerized reminders providing patient-specific recommendations at each visit and/or feedback on performance every 2 weeks. When glucose levels exceeded 150 mg/dL (8.33 mmol/L) during visits of 4038 patients, health care provider behavior was characterized as did nothing, did anything (any intensification of therapy), or did enough (if intensification met recommendations).

RESULTS

At baseline, residents did anything for 35% of visits and did enough for 21% of visits when changes in therapy were indicated, and there were no differences among intervention groups. During the trial, intensification increased most during the first year and then declined. However, intensification increased more in the feedback alone and feedback plus reminders groups than for reminders alone and control groups (P<.001). After 3 years, health care provider behavior in the reminders alone and control groups returned to baseline, whereas improvement with feedback alone and feedback plus reminders groups was sustained: 52% did anything, and 30% did enough (P<.001 for both vs the reminders alone and control groups). Multivariable analysis showed that feedback on performance contributed independently to intensification and that intensification contributed independently to fall in HbA1c (P<.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback on performance given to medical resident primary care providers improved provider behavior and lowered HbA1c levels. Similar approaches may aid health care provider behavior and improve diabetes outcomes in other primary care settings.

摘要

背景

尽管临床试验表明,糖尿病的合理管理可改善预后,且治疗指南广泛应用,但美国糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平仍在上升。由于过程指标正在改善,血糖控制不佳可能反映出医疗服务提供者在有指征时未能加强糖尿病治疗——即临床惰性。我们探讨了针对医疗服务提供者行为的干预措施是否能克服这一障碍并改善血糖控制。

方法

在一项为期3年的试验中,345名内科住院医师被随机分为对照组或接受计算机提醒,每次就诊时提供针对患者的建议和/或每2周提供一次绩效反馈。在4038例患者就诊期间,当血糖水平超过150 mg/dL(8.33 mmol/L)时,医疗服务提供者的行为被描述为未采取任何措施、采取了任何措施(任何治疗强化)或采取了足够措施(如果强化符合建议)。

结果

在基线时,当需要改变治疗时,住院医师在35%的就诊中采取了任何措施,在21%的就诊中采取了足够措施,各干预组之间无差异。在试验期间,强化措施在第一年增加最多,然后下降。然而,仅反馈组和反馈加提醒组的强化增加幅度大于仅提醒组和对照组(P<0.001)。3年后,仅提醒组和对照组的医疗服务提供者行为恢复到基线水平,而仅反馈组和反馈加提醒组的改善得以持续:52%采取了任何措施,30%采取了足够措施(与仅提醒组和对照组相比,两者P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,绩效反馈独立促进了强化措施的实施,而强化措施独立导致了HbA1c水平的下降(两者P<0.001)。

结论

向内科住院医师初级保健提供者提供绩效反馈可改善提供者行为并降低HbA1c水平。类似方法可能有助于其他初级保健环境中的医疗服务提供者行为并改善糖尿病预后。

相似文献

1
An intervention to overcome clinical inertia and improve diabetes mellitus control in a primary care setting: Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) 8.一项旨在克服临床惰性并改善基层医疗环境中糖尿病控制情况的干预措施:改善非裔美国人糖尿病的基层医疗(IPCAAD)8。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):507-13. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.507.
2
An endocrinologist-supported intervention aimed at providers improves diabetes management in a primary care site: improving primary care of African Americans with diabetes (IPCAAD) 7.一项由内分泌学家支持、针对医疗服务提供者的干预措施改善了基层医疗场所的糖尿病管理:改善非裔美国糖尿病患者的基层医疗(IPCAAD)7。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2352-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2352.
3
The Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) project: rationale and design.
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Oct;23(5):554-69. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00230-1.
4
Diabetes in urban African-Americans. XVI. Overcoming clinical inertia improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.城市非裔美国人中的糖尿病。十六。克服临床惰性可改善2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Sep;22(9):1494-500. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1494.
5
Clinical inertia contributes to poor diabetes control in a primary care setting.临床惰性导致基层医疗环境中糖尿病控制不佳。
Diabetes Educ. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4):564-71. doi: 10.1177/0145721705279050.
6
Diabetes in urban African-Americans. IX. Provider adherence to management protocols.城市非裔美国人中的糖尿病。IX. 医疗服务提供者对管理方案的依从性。
Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):698-703. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.698.
7
Design of a trial to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists and community health promoters working with African-Americans and Latinos with diabetes.评估临床药师和社区健康促进者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔糖尿病患者合作的影响的试验设计。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 23;12:891. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-891.
8
A randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker team interventions in urban African-Americans with type 2 diabetes.一项关于护士个案管理师和社区卫生工作者团队干预措施对城市非裔美国2型糖尿病患者影响的随机对照试验。
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.10.010.
9
An informatics-supported intervention improves diabetes control in a primary care setting.一项由信息学支持的干预措施改善了基层医疗环境中的糖尿病控制情况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:1160.
10
Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial.个体化电子决策支持与提醒以改善社区糖尿病护理:COMPETE II随机试验
CMAJ. 2009 Jul 7;181(1-2):37-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081272.

引用本文的文献

1
Real world evidence of insulin and biosimilar insulin therapy-Opportunities to improve adherence, outcomes and cost-effectiveness.胰岛素及生物类似物胰岛素治疗的真实世界证据——改善依从性、治疗效果和成本效益的机遇
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1111/dom.16386.
2
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
3
Multidisciplinary proactive e-consults to improve guideline-directed medical therapies for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: an implementation study.
多学科主动电子咨询改善糖尿病和慢性肾脏病患者的指南导向性药物治疗:一项实施研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 May 6;12(3):e004155. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004155.
4
The Current Place of DPP4 Inhibitors in the Evolving Landscape of Type 2 Diabetes Management: Is It Time to Bid Adieu?二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂在不断变化的 2 型糖尿病管理格局中的现状:是时候告别了吗?
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 Nov;23(6):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00610-8. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
5
Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study.评估电子患者报告结局工具在满足复杂护理需求的老年患者中的实施情况和效果:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e29071. doi: 10.2196/29071.
6
A theory-based meta-regression of factors influencing clinical decision support adoption and implementation.基于理论的影响临床决策支持采用和实施因素的元回归分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Oct 12;28(11):2514-2522. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab160.
7
Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA.美国的糖尿病护理质量。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jun 3;23(7):73. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5.
8
Design and methods of NYC care calls: An effectiveness trial of telephone-delivered type 2 diabetes self-management support.纽约护理电话的设计与方法:一项电话传递式 2 型糖尿病自我管理支持的有效性试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Nov;98:106166. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106166. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
9
INTEGRA study protocol: primary care intervention in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycaemic control.INTEGRA 研究方案:血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的初级保健干预。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 7;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0916-9.
10
Nudging physicians and patients with autopend clinical decision support to improve diabetes management.利用自动临床决策支持推动医生和患者,以改善糖尿病管理。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Oct;24(10):479-483.