• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剂量探索研究的连续重新评估方法:教程

The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.

作者信息

Garrett-Mayer Elizabeth

机构信息

Division of Oncology Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.

DOI:10.1191/1740774506cn134oa
PMID:16539090
Abstract

The Continual Reassessment Method (CRM), along with other adaptive dose-finding study designs, has gained popularity since its proposal by O'Quigley. Several of the reasons it has been embraced by clinical trialists is that it tends to incur fewer toxic events, and more accurately estimate the maximum tolerated dose as compared to the standard Phase I dose escalation designs. Many variations have been published and discussed in the statistical literature, but there has not been as much practical advice for choosing design parameters and implementing the CRM. As a result, the CRM has not been as widely utilized as it could be for dose-finding studies. The goal of this paper is to provide a tutorial for those unfamiliar with the CRM who are either statisticians considering using the CRM for the first time, or investigators with some statistical background. This paper presents the original CRM, and then some of its modified versions. It also explains the specifications that define a CRM design, along with simulated examples of CRMs and standard designs, for illustration.

摘要

连续重新评估法(CRM)与其他适应性剂量探索研究设计一样,自奥奎利提出以来就颇受欢迎。临床试验人员采用它的几个原因在于,与标准的I期剂量递增设计相比,它往往会引发更少的毒性事件,并且能更准确地估计最大耐受剂量。统计文献中已发表并讨论了许多变体,但对于选择设计参数和实施CRM,却没有太多实用的建议。因此,CRM在剂量探索研究中的应用并未达到其应有的广泛程度。本文的目的是为那些不熟悉CRM的人提供一个教程,这些人要么是首次考虑使用CRM的统计学家,要么是有一定统计背景的研究人员。本文介绍了原始的CRM,以及它的一些修改版本。还解释了定义CRM设计的规范,并给出了CRM和标准设计的模拟示例以作说明。

相似文献

1
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.剂量探索研究的连续重新评估方法:教程
Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.
2
How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.如何使用连续评估法设计剂量探索研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0638-z.
3
Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.癌症I期试验中的三剂量队列设计。
Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2070-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.3054.
4
Retrospective robustness of the continual reassessment method.连续重新评估法的回顾性稳健性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Sep;20(5):1013-25. doi: 10.1080/10543400903315732.
5
Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.“过量控制递增法”设计的改进及其与受限连续重新评估法的比较。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Nov;18(6):659-670. doi: 10.1002/pst.1955. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.滚动连续评估法加过量控制:一种高效安全的剂量递增设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106436. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106436. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Sensitivity of dose-finding studies to observation errors.剂量探索研究对观测误差的敏感性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):523-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
8
Dose-escalation designs in oncology: ADEPT and the CRM.肿瘤学中的剂量递增设计:自适应剂量递增设计(ADEPT)与连续重新评估方法(CRM)
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 20;27(26):5345-53; discussion 5354-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.3403.
9
Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose-finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West.连续评估法在日本患者 I 期剂量探索试验中的应用:东学西渐。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2090-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3999. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
10
Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.评估肿瘤 1 期临床试验剂量递增阶段的各种连续再评估方法模型:使用真实临床数据和模拟研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07703-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Bayesian approaches in oncology clinical trials: A cross-sectional analysis.贝叶斯方法在肿瘤学临床试验中的应用:一项横断面分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 25;16:1548997. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548997. eCollection 2025.
2
SEVUparin as a potential Adjunctive Treatment in children with severe malaria: A phase I trial safety and dose finding trial (SEVUSMAART).SEVUparin作为重症疟疾儿童潜在辅助治疗方法:一项I期安全性和剂量探索试验(SEVUSMAART)。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:484. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20111.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Population pharmacokinetics of TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in a phase I trial.
TLD-1(一种新型脂质体阿霉素)在 I 期临床试验中的群体药代动力学。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;94(3):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s00280-024-04679-z. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
4
A new function for drug combination dose finding trials.药物联合剂量发现试验的新功能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53155-4.
5
Phase 1 trial of navitoclax and sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors with hepatocellular carcinoma expansion cohort.纳维托昔单抗和索拉非尼治疗复发或难治性实体瘤患者的 1 期临床试验,扩展队列包括肝细胞癌患者。
Invest New Drugs. 2024 Feb;42(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10637-024-01420-8. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
6
Application of isotonic regression in estimating ED and its 95% confidence interval by bootstrap method for a biased coin up-and-down sequential dose-finding design.等渗回归在通过自展法估计有偏硬币上下序贯剂量探索设计的有效剂量(ED)及其95%置信区间中的应用。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;67(9):828-831. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_431_23. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
7
The effect of a multi-component behavior change technique intervention on medication adherence among individuals on primary prevention statin therapy: a dose-finding protocol.多组分行为改变技术干预对初级预防他汀类药物治疗人群药物依从性的影响:剂量发现方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 12;24(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07549-w.
8
The Future Glioblastoma Clinical Trials Landscape: Early Phase 0, Window of Opportunity, and Adaptive Phase I-III Studies.未来胶质母细胞瘤临床试验格局:早期 0 期、机会之窗和适应性 I-III 期研究。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):1047-1055. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01433-1. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
9
Ethics and Clinical Research: Improving Transparency and Informed Consent in Phase I Oncology Trials.伦理与临床研究:提高肿瘤学I期试验的透明度和知情同意率
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;41(12):2155-2158. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01736. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Comparison of design methods for a safety run-in phase of a phase II clinical trial.比较 II 期临床试验安全入组阶段的设计方法。
Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;20(2):181-191. doi: 10.1177/17407745221140913. Epub 2023 Jan 11.