Suppr超能文献

“过量控制递增法”设计的改进及其与受限连续重新评估法的比较。

Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.

作者信息

Ji Lingyun, Lewinger Juan Pablo, Krailo Mark, Groshen Susan, Conti David V, Asgharzadeh Shahab, Sposto Richard

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Pediatrics and Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2019 Nov;18(6):659-670. doi: 10.1002/pst.1955. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

The Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) design for cancer dose finding clinical trials is a variation of the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) that was proposed to overcome the limitation of the original CRM of exposing patients to high toxic doses. The properties of EWOC have been studied to some extent, but some aspects of the design are not well studied, and its performance is not fully understood. Comparisons of the EWOC design to the most commonly used modified CRM designs have not yet been performed, and the advantages of EWOC over the modified CRM designs are unclear. In this paper, we assess the properties of the EWOC design and of the restricted CRM and some variations of these designs. We show that EWOC has several weaknesses that CRM does not have that make it impractical to use in its original formulation. We propose modified EWOC designs that address some of the weaknesses and that have some desirable statistical properties compared with the original EWOC design, the restricted CRM design, and the 3 + 3 design. However, their statistical properties are sensitive to correct specification of the prior distribution of their parameters and hence nevertheless will need to be used with some caution. The restricted CRM design is shown to have more stable performance across a wider family of dose-toxicity curves than EWOC and therefore may be a preferable general choice in cancer clinical research.

摘要

用于癌症剂量探索临床试验的过量控制递增法(EWOC)设计是连续重新评估法(CRM)的一种变体,该方法旨在克服原始CRM使患者暴露于高毒性剂量的局限性。EWOC的特性已得到一定程度的研究,但该设计的某些方面尚未得到充分研究,其性能也未被完全理解。EWOC设计与最常用的改良CRM设计之间尚未进行比较,EWOC相对于改良CRM设计的优势尚不清楚。在本文中,我们评估了EWOC设计、受限CRM及其一些变体的特性。我们表明,EWOC存在一些CRM所没有的弱点,这使得其原始形式在实际应用中不切实际。我们提出了改良的EWOC设计,这些设计解决了一些弱点,并且与原始EWOC设计、受限CRM设计和3+3设计相比具有一些理想的统计特性。然而,它们的统计特性对其参数先验分布的正确设定很敏感,因此仍需谨慎使用。结果表明,受限CRM设计在更广泛的剂量-毒性曲线族中具有比EWOC更稳定的性能,因此可能是癌症临床研究中更可取的一般选择。

相似文献

2
Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106436. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106436. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Mar;37(2):322-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.
Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.
5
Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):949-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
6
Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2070-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.3054.
7
GUIP1: a R package for dose escalation strategies in phase I cancer clinical trials.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01149-3.
8
Exposure driven dose escalation design with overdose control: Concept and first real life experience in an oncology phase I trial.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Feb 5;26:100901. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100901. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.
Stat Sci. 2010;25(2):202-216. doi: 10.1214/10-STS332.
2
Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.
Biostatistics. 2011 Apr;12(2):386-98. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq062. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
3
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
4
Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;25(31):4982-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1012.
5
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.
Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.
6
Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials.
Biostatistics. 2001 Jun;2(2):203-15. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.2.203.
7
Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.
Stat Med. 1999 Jun 15;18(11):1307-21. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990615)18:11<1307::aid-sim128>3.0.co;2-x.
8
Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.
Stat Med. 1998 May 30;17(10):1103-20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1103::aid-sim793>3.0.co;2-9.
9
Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;41(6):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s002800050763.
10
A comparison of two phase I trial designs.
Stat Med. 1994 Sep 30;13(18):1799-806. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131802.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验