• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸治疗——使用同行评估评级指数的改进与标准

Orthodontic treatment--improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index.

作者信息

Onyeaso Chukwudi Ochi, Begole Ellen A

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):260-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0260:OTASUT]2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0260:OTASUT]2.0.CO;2
PMID:16539550
Abstract

This article is aimed at assessing the orthodontic treatment outcome in an accredited graduate orthodontic clinic in the United States, using the original Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. A sample of 100 pre- and posttreatment study models was randomly selected from the clinic model storage. One investigator assessed all the components of the PAR Index. Descriptive statistics and Scheffe test were used to analyze the data. The mean weighted PAR point reduction was 22.11, and mean percentage reduction was 86.20. "Greatly improved" conditions were seen in 50% of patients while 47% accounted for the "improved category." Only 3% belonged to the "worse or no different" group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the three improvement groups for weighted pre- and posttreatment PAR scores, reduction, and percentage reduction. The results indicated an excellent improvement of the patients, with patients being treated to a high standard and a great proportion of patients with a clear need for treatment.

摘要

本文旨在使用原始的同行评估评分(PAR)指数,评估美国一家获得认证的研究生正畸诊所的正畸治疗效果。从诊所模型库中随机抽取了100个治疗前和治疗后的研究模型样本。由一名研究人员评估PAR指数的所有组成部分。使用描述性统计和谢费检验来分析数据。PAR加权平均分降低了22.11,平均降低百分比为86.20。50%的患者状况“大幅改善”,47%属于“改善类别”。只有3%属于“更差或无差异”组。在三个改善组之间,治疗前和治疗后的PAR加权评分、降低值和降低百分比存在统计学上的显著差异。结果表明患者有显著改善,患者接受了高标准治疗,且很大一部分患者明显需要治疗。

相似文献

1
Orthodontic treatment--improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index.正畸治疗——使用同行评估评级指数的改进与标准
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):260-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0260:OTASUT]2.0.CO;2.
2
Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗的咬合结果。
Angle Orthod. 1998 Oct;68(5):439-44. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0439:OOOOT>2.3.CO;2.
3
Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.使用同伴评估评分指数进行正畸治疗结果评估。
Angle Orthod. 2001 Jun;71(3):164-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0164:OOAUTP>2.0.CO;2.
4
[Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].[根据同伴评估评分指数评估正畸治疗的疗效]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:335-51.
5
Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.复杂指数、治疗结果与需求、牙齿美学指数、同伴评价等级指数以及美国正畸医师委员会客观评分系统之间的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Feb;131(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.045.
6
Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.一家研究生正畸诊所中,针对由美国正畸委员会错颌分类所定义病例的治疗结果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):822-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.036.
7
Are the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?同行评估评级指数以及治疗复杂性、结果和需求指数是否适合用于正颌手术结果的评估?
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Oct;28(5):462-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji120. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
8
Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in educational and private practice settings.教育机构与私人诊所正畸治疗效果的比较。
J Dent Educ. 2002 Jan;66(1):94-9.
9
Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.亚洲男性错颌畸形严重程度与错颌畸形类型及正畸治疗需求的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.045.
10
Orthodontic treatment need in an accredited graduate orthodontic center in north america: a pilot study.北美一家经认可的研究生正畸中心的正畸治疗需求:一项试点研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):87-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of orthodontic care in an academic setting in the Middle East.中东地区学术环境下的正畸治疗质量。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87927-3.
2
Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.正畸治疗质量:德国多中心队列研究 第 1 部分:正畸治疗效果评估及预测因素。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):291-306. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.
使用同伴评估评分(PAR)指数评估非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者的正畸治疗效果。
J Orthod Sci. 2020 Nov 2;9:17. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20. eCollection 2020.
4
Orthodontic Treatment and Healthcare Goals: Evaluation of Multibrackets Treatment Results Using PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating).正畸治疗与健康目标:使用PAR指数(同行评估评级)评估多托槽治疗结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;8(4):473. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040473.
5
Orthodontic treatment of a particular subgroup of children with special health care needs, children with craniofacial anomalies: An analysis of treatment length and clinical outcome.对有特殊医疗需求的特定儿童亚组,即患有颅面畸形的儿童进行正畸治疗:治疗时长及临床结果分析。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):115-20. doi: 10.2319/122014.1. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
6
Evaluation of treatment outcomes in a 3 years post-graduate orthodontic program using the peer assessment rating (par).使用同伴评估评分(PAR)对正畸研究生三年制课程的治疗结果进行评估。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Oct 1;6(4):e364-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.51512. eCollection 2014 Oct.
7
A comparative study of treatment outcomes between begg and edgewise orthodontic systems in class I cases.安氏I类病例中Begg矫治器与方丝弓矫治系统治疗效果的对比研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Sep;11(5):574-8.
8
Prevalence of Malocclusion among 6 to 10 Year old Nalgonda School Children.纳尔贡达地区6至10岁学童错颌畸形的患病率
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Dec;5(6):49-54. Epub 2013 Dec 26.