Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Gießen, University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Sep;83(5):291-306. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors.
A total of 586 patients from seven German study centers were screened for this cohort study, of which 361 patients were recruited at the end of their orthodontic treatment. Of these, 26 patients had missing study models and/or missing treatment information. Thus, 335 participants were included. The severity of malocclusion was rated using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index at baseline (T0) retrospectively and-prospectively-after the retention period (T1). Practitioner-, treatment- and patient-related information were analyzed in order to detect potential predictive factors for treatment effectiveness.
Study participants (202 female and 133 male) were on average 14.8 (standard deviation [SD] ± 6.1) years old at start of active treatment. Average PAR score at T0 was 25.96 (SD ± 10.75) and mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.67 (SD ± 2.98) at T1. An average decrease of total PAR score by 22.30 points (SD ± 10.73) or 83.54% (SD ± 14.58; p < 0.001) was detected. Furthermore, 164 treatments (49.1%) were categorized as 'greatly improved' but only 3 treatments (0.9%) as 'worse or no different'; 81.5% of all cases finished with a high-quality treatment outcome (≤5 PAR points at T1). Logistic regression analyses detected staff experience as a significant predictive factor for high-quality results (odds ratio 1.27, p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.46).
The improvement rate among this selected German cohort indicated an overall very good standard of orthodontic treatment. Staff experience proved to be a predictive factor for high-quality results.
近年来,正畸治疗及其效果越来越成为政治和公众关注的焦点。因此,这项多中心队列研究旨在报告德国正畸治疗的效果,并确定潜在的影响因素。
本研究共筛选了来自德国 7 个研究中心的 586 名患者,其中 361 名患者在正畸治疗结束时入组。其中 26 名患者缺少研究模型和/或治疗信息。因此,共纳入 335 名参与者。使用Peer Assessment Rating(PAR)指数在基线(T0)时进行回顾性和前瞻性评价,并在保持期(T1)后进行评价,以评估错牙合畸形的严重程度。分析医生、治疗和患者相关信息,以发现治疗效果的潜在预测因素。
研究参与者(202 名女性和 133 名男性)在开始主动治疗时平均年龄为 14.8(标准差 [SD]±6.1)岁。T0 时平均 PAR 评分为 25.96(SD±10.75),T1 时平均治疗后 PAR 评分为 3.67(SD±2.98)。平均总 PAR 评分降低 22.30 分(SD±10.73)或 83.54%(SD±14.58;p<0.001)。此外,164 例治疗(49.1%)被归类为“显著改善”,但只有 3 例(0.9%)被归类为“更差或无差异”;81.5%的病例治疗结果为高质量(T1 时 PAR 评分≤5)。Logistic 回归分析发现,医生经验是高质量结果的显著预测因素(优势比 1.27,p=0.001,95%置信区间 1.11-1.46)。
在这个选定的德国队列中,改善率表明整体正畸治疗的标准非常好。医生经验被证明是高质量结果的预测因素。