• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症联盟对向阿巴拉契亚农村地区社区组织传播结直肠癌相关资料的影响。

The impact of cancer coalitions on the dissemination of colorectal cancer materials to community organizations in rural Appalachia.

作者信息

Ward Ann J, Coffey Kluhsman Brenda, Lengerich Eugene J, Piccinin Andrea M

机构信息

Community Cancer Control, Research, and Education, PO Box 355, Lemont, PA 16851, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A55. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

PMID:16539796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1563978/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of colorectal cancer in portions of rural Appalachia is higher than in much of the United States. To reduce this disparity, cancer-control strategies could be adapted to and implemented in rural Appalachian communities. The objectives of this pilot study were to develop and test community-based participatory research methods to examine whether cancer coalitions in Appalachia could effectively disseminate print materials from a national media campaign intended to promote colorectal cancer awareness to their rural communities.

METHODS

This pilot study used a two-arm intervention design with random selection of 450 community organizations from nine counties with cancer coalitions (the coalition arm) and 450 organizations from nine matched counties without a cancer coalition (the noncoalition arm) in northern Appalachia. The primary outcome measures were participation by and interest of community organizations in dissemination of materials from Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign, a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer education and screening. The data were collected with prestudy and poststudy surveys.

RESULTS

One-hundred thirty (29%) organizations participated in the coalition arm, and 38 (8%) participated in the noncoalition arm (P < .001). Within the coalition arm, 86 of the 119 (66%) organizations that responded to the question about influence reported being influenced to participate by the local coalition. Initial interest in dissemination was high in each of the study arms but remained higher throughout the study in the coalition arm than the noncoalition arm.

CONCLUSION

Community cancer coalitions can increase the local dissemination of material from a national media campaign in rural Appalachia. Continued development and study of methods for coalitions to translate and implement cancer-control strategies at a local level in Appalachia is warranted.

摘要

引言

阿巴拉契亚部分农村地区的结直肠癌发病率高于美国大部分地区。为了缩小这一差距,可以在阿巴拉契亚农村社区调整并实施癌症控制策略。这项试点研究的目的是开发并测试基于社区的参与性研究方法,以检验阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症联盟能否有效地向其农村社区传播旨在提高结直肠癌认识的全国性媒体宣传活动的印刷材料。

方法

这项试点研究采用双臂干预设计,从阿巴拉契亚北部九个有癌症联盟的县中随机选择450个社区组织(联盟组),并从九个匹配的没有癌症联盟的县中随机选择450个组织(非联盟组)。主要结局指标是社区组织参与“生命筛查:全国结直肠癌行动运动”(一项促进结直肠癌教育和筛查的全国性运动)材料传播的情况以及兴趣。数据通过研究前和研究后的调查收集。

结果

联盟组中有130个(29%)组织参与,非联盟组中有38个(8%)组织参与(P <.001)。在联盟组中,119个回答了关于影响力问题的组织中有86个(66%)报告称受到当地联盟的影响而参与。每个研究组对传播的初始兴趣都很高,但在整个研究过程中,联盟组的兴趣始终高于非联盟组。

结论

社区癌症联盟可以增加阿巴拉契亚农村地区全国性媒体宣传活动材料的本地传播。有必要继续开发和研究联盟在阿巴拉契亚地区地方层面转化和实施癌症控制策略的方法。

相似文献

1
The impact of cancer coalitions on the dissemination of colorectal cancer materials to community organizations in rural Appalachia.癌症联盟对向阿巴拉契亚农村地区社区组织传播结直肠癌相关资料的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A55. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
Qualitative assessment of local distribution of Screen for Life mass media materials in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区“关注生命”大众媒体材料的本地分布定性评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A54. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
3
Initiatives of 11 rural Appalachian cancer coalitions in Pennsylvania and New York.宾夕法尼亚州和纽约州11个阿巴拉契亚农村癌症联盟的倡议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A122. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
4
Effect of community coalition structure and preparation on the subsequent implementation of cancer control activities.社区联盟结构与准备工作对后续癌症控制活动实施的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2004 Jul-Aug;18(6):424-34. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.6.424.
5
Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia.推进农村癌症控制的参与度和能力:弗吉尼亚州西南部阿巴拉契亚地区社区-学术咨询委员会的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00285-y.
6
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial.通过实施科学(ACCSIS)在阿巴拉契亚加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:一项群组随机、延迟干预试验的方案。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):748-756. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017.
7
The Colorectal Cancer Coalition: reflections on the future.结直肠癌联盟:对未来的思考
Oncologist. 2006 Oct;11(9):970-2. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-9-970.
8
The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.阿巴拉契亚癌症网络:针对农村医疗服务不足人群的癌症控制研究。
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00026.x.
9
Results of coordinated investigations of a national colorectal cancer education campaign in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区一项全国性结直肠癌教育活动的协同调查结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A32. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
10
Development of community plans to enhance survivorship from colorectal cancer: community-based participatory research in rural communities.制定提高结直肠癌生存率的社区计划:农村社区的基于社区的参与性研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Sep;1(3):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0025-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing evidence-based practices in rural settings: a scoping review of theories, models, and frameworks.在农村地区实施循证实践:对理论、模型和框架的范围综述
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jul 5;4:1326777. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1326777. eCollection 2024.
2
Frontiers in Gastrointestinal Oncology: Advances in Multi-Disciplinary Patient Care.胃肠肿瘤学前沿:多学科患者护理进展
Biomedicines. 2018 Jun 1;6(2):64. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6020064.
3
The Effects of Hospital Characteristics on Delays in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Appalachian Communities: A Population-Based Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative assessment of local distribution of Screen for Life mass media materials in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区“关注生命”大众媒体材料的本地分布定性评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A54. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
Toward a patient-centered approach: incorporating principles of participatory action research into clinical studies.迈向以患者为中心的方法:将参与式行动研究原则纳入临床研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2005 Mar;4(1):21-4. doi: 10.1177/1534735404273727.
3
Cancer incidence in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: disparities in Appalachia.
阿巴拉契亚社区中医院特征对乳腺癌诊断延迟的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s91-s103. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12226. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
4
Analysis of the benefits and costs of a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer screening: CDC's screen for life-national colorectal cancer action campaign.一项促进结直肠癌筛查的全国性运动的效益与成本分析:美国疾病控制与预防中心的“为生命筛查——全国结直肠癌行动运动”
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):750-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839913519446. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州解决癌症差异的社区策略。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):31-43. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385d2c.
6
Health disparities between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties in Virginia USA.美国弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚和非阿巴拉契亚县之间的健康差距。
J Community Health. 2011 Jun;36(3):348-56. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9315-9.
7
Development of community plans to enhance survivorship from colorectal cancer: community-based participatory research in rural communities.制定提高结直肠癌生存率的社区计划:农村社区的基于社区的参与性研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Sep;1(3):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0025-y.
8
Initiatives of 11 rural Appalachian cancer coalitions in Pennsylvania and New York.宾夕法尼亚州和纽约州11个阿巴拉契亚农村癌症联盟的倡议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A122. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
9
Results of coordinated investigations of a national colorectal cancer education campaign in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区一项全国性结直肠癌教育活动的协同调查结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A32. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
肯塔基州、宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州的癌症发病率:阿巴拉契亚地区的差异。
J Rural Health. 2005 Winter;21(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00060.x.
4
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.基于社区的参与性研究:评估证据
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004 Aug(99):1-8.
5
ATECAR: An Asian American community-based participatory research model on tobacco and cancer control.ATECAR:一种基于亚裔美国人社区的烟草与癌症控制参与式研究模式。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Oct;5(4):382-94. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260146.
6
'Imi Hale -- the Native Hawaiian cancer awareness, research, and training network: second-year status report.伊米·黑尔——夏威夷原住民癌症意识、研究与培训网络:第二年状况报告。
Asian Am Pac Isl J Health. 2003 Winter-Spring;10(1):4-16.
7
Effect of community coalition structure and preparation on the subsequent implementation of cancer control activities.社区联盟结构与准备工作对后续癌症控制活动实施的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2004 Jul-Aug;18(6):424-34. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.6.424.
8
The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.阿巴拉契亚癌症网络:针对农村医疗服务不足人群的癌症控制研究。
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00026.x.
9
Expanding the reach of health campaigns: community organizations as meta-channels for the dissemination of health information.扩大健康运动的覆盖范围:社区组织作为健康信息传播的元渠道
J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:97-111. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271557.
10
A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model.对扩散模型的前瞻性与回顾性审视。
J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:13-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271449.