• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿巴拉契亚地区“关注生命”大众媒体材料的本地分布定性评估。

Qualitative assessment of local distribution of Screen for Life mass media materials in Appalachia.

作者信息

Vanderpool Robin C, Coyne Cathy A

机构信息

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Control Program, 2365 Harrodsburg Rd, Suite A230, Lexington, KY 40504, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A54. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

PMID:16539795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1563976/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign is a multimedia campaign that informs men and women aged 50 and older about the importance of colorectal cancer screening. The Appalachia Cancer Network undertook a qualitative research study to help determine whether Screen for Life materials are being used and distributed by organizations serving Appalachian residents and to help assess key informants' perceived acceptability of the materials.

METHODS

Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 state and local informants in three Appalachian states to assess the diversity of community organizations that received the materials, the level of material use, and receptivity to Screen for Life.

RESULTS

Regional cancer control programs were more active in promoting Screen for Life at local levels than state health departments. Although state health departments are the primary route for distributing Screen for Life materials, they did not report the breadth of activities noted by regional cancer control programs. Several local interview respondents were unfamiliar with Screen for Life, and respondents who were familiar with Screen for Life used the materials in a general, unplanned way. Although some respondents were unfamiliar with the campaign materials, they were interested in Screen for Life. No formal evaluations on the effectiveness of the materials were reported.

CONCLUSION

More guidance on how to implement the Screen for Life campaign as a targeted health communication media campaign would be helpful.

摘要

引言

“为生命筛查:全国结直肠癌行动运动”是一项多媒体运动,旨在告知50岁及以上的男性和女性结直肠癌筛查的重要性。阿巴拉契亚癌症网络开展了一项定性研究,以帮助确定“为生命筛查”的材料是否被服务于阿巴拉契亚居民的组织使用和分发,并帮助评估关键信息提供者对这些材料的可接受程度。

方法

对阿巴拉契亚三个州的13位州和地方信息提供者进行了半结构化电话访谈,以评估收到这些材料的社区组织的多样性、材料的使用水平以及对“为生命筛查”的接受程度。

结果

区域癌症控制项目在地方层面推广“为生命筛查”比州卫生部门更为积极。虽然州卫生部门是分发“为生命筛查”材料的主要途径,但他们并未报告区域癌症控制项目所开展活动的广度。几位参与地方访谈的受访者不熟悉“为生命筛查”,熟悉该项目的受访者对材料的使用方式较为随意,缺乏计划性。尽管一些受访者不熟悉活动材料,但他们对“为生命筛查”感兴趣。未报告对这些材料有效性的正式评估情况。

结论

提供更多关于如何将“为生命筛查”运动作为有针对性的健康传播媒体运动来实施的指导会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Qualitative assessment of local distribution of Screen for Life mass media materials in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区“关注生命”大众媒体材料的本地分布定性评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A54. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
The impact of cancer coalitions on the dissemination of colorectal cancer materials to community organizations in rural Appalachia.癌症联盟对向阿巴拉契亚农村地区社区组织传播结直肠癌相关资料的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A55. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
3
Observations from the CDC: CDC's Screen for Life: a National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign.美国疾病控制与预防中心的观察:美国疾病控制与预防中心的“为生命筛查:全国结直肠癌行动运动”。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jun;10(5):417-22. doi: 10.1089/152460901300233876.
4
Evaluation of educational materials on colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区结直肠癌筛查教育材料评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A43. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
5
Results of coordinated investigations of a national colorectal cancer education campaign in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区一项全国性结直肠癌教育活动的协同调查结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A32. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
6
The Colorectal Cancer Coalition: reflections on the future.结直肠癌联盟:对未来的思考
Oncologist. 2006 Oct;11(9):970-2. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-9-970.
7
Analysis of the benefits and costs of a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer screening: CDC's screen for life-national colorectal cancer action campaign.一项促进结直肠癌筛查的全国性运动的效益与成本分析:美国疾病控制与预防中心的“为生命筛查——全国结直肠癌行动运动”
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):750-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839913519446. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
8
Can donated media placements reach intended audiences?捐赠的媒体投放能否触达目标受众?
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Sep;14(5):656-62. doi: 10.1177/1524839913488891. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
Community involvement in the development and feedback about a colorectal cancer screening media campaign in Ohio Appalachia.俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区社区参与结直肠癌筛查媒体宣传活动的开展及反馈。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Jul;12(4):589-99. doi: 10.1177/1524839909353736. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
10
Community Members' Input into Cancer Prevention Campaign Development and Experience Being Featured in the Campaign.社区成员对癌症预防活动开展的投入以及在活动中被专题报道的经历。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):149-56. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0043.

引用本文的文献

1
Frontiers in Gastrointestinal Oncology: Advances in Multi-Disciplinary Patient Care.胃肠肿瘤学前沿:多学科患者护理进展
Biomedicines. 2018 Jun 1;6(2):64. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6020064.
2
Process Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Media Campaigns in Appalachian Ohio.俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区癌症预防媒体宣传活动的过程评估
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Mar;18(2):201-210. doi: 10.1177/1524839916641638. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
3
Analysis of the benefits and costs of a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer screening: CDC's screen for life-national colorectal cancer action campaign.一项促进结直肠癌筛查的全国性运动的效益与成本分析:美国疾病控制与预防中心的“为生命筛查——全国结直肠癌行动运动”
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):750-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839913519446. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
4
Cancer information scanning and seeking in the general population.一般人群的癌症信息扫描和寻求。
J Health Commun. 2010 Oct;15(7):734-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.514029.
5
Health disparities between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties in Virginia USA.美国弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚和非阿巴拉契亚县之间的健康差距。
J Community Health. 2011 Jun;36(3):348-56. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9315-9.
6
The impact of cancer coalitions on the dissemination of colorectal cancer materials to community organizations in rural Appalachia.癌症联盟对向阿巴拉契亚农村地区社区组织传播结直肠癌相关资料的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A55. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
7
Results of coordinated investigations of a national colorectal cancer education campaign in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区一项全国性结直肠癌教育活动的协同调查结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A32. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of educational materials on colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区结直肠癌筛查教育材料评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A43. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
Cancer incidence in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: disparities in Appalachia.肯塔基州、宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州的癌症发病率:阿巴拉契亚地区的差异。
J Rural Health. 2005 Winter;21(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00060.x.
3
The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.阿巴拉契亚癌症网络:针对农村医疗服务不足人群的癌症控制研究。
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00026.x.
4
Colorectal cancer screening practices among men and women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1999.1999年美国农村和非农村地区男性及女性的结直肠癌筛查情况
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00017.x.
5
Cancer death rates--Appalachia, 1994-1998.癌症死亡率——阿巴拉契亚地区,1994 - 1998年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002 Jun 21;51(24):527-9.
6
Observations from the CDC: CDC's Screen for Life: a National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign.美国疾病控制与预防中心的观察:美国疾病控制与预防中心的“为生命筛查:全国结直肠癌行动运动”。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jun;10(5):417-22. doi: 10.1089/152460901300233876.
7
Community cancer control in a rural, underserved population: the Appalachian Leadership Initiative on Cancer Project.农村医疗服务欠缺人群的社区癌症控制:阿巴拉契亚癌症防治领导倡议项目
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001 Feb;12(1):5-19. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0523.