• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A framework for developing evaluation tools used in Washington State's Healthy Communities projects.华盛顿州健康社区项目中所使用的评估工具开发框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A64. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
Equity and Accessibility of Washington State's COVID-19 Digital Exposure Notification Tool (WA Notify): Survey and Listening Sessions Among Community Leaders.华盛顿州新冠病毒数字接触者通知工具(WA Notify)的公平性与可及性:针对社区领袖的调查与听证会
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 3;6(8):e38193. doi: 10.2196/38193.
3
Testing the recommendations of the Washington State Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan: the Moses Lake case study.检验华盛顿州营养与身体活动计划的建议:摩西湖案例研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A59. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
4
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
5
Process evaluation of a regional public health model to reduce chronic disease through policy and systems changes, Washington State, 2010-2014.2010 - 2014年华盛顿州通过政策和系统变革减少慢性病的区域公共卫生模式的过程评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Mar 19;12:E37. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140446.
6
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量:华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
7
Washington 'Steps' Up: A 10-Step Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Breastfeeding Support in Community Health Centers.华盛顿“行动”起来:一项在社区健康中心优化母乳喂养支持的十步质量改进倡议。
J Hum Lact. 2015 Nov;31(4):651-9. doi: 10.1177/0890334415591147. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
8
Variability in practices for investigation, prevention, and control of communicable diseases among Washington State's Local health jurisdictions.华盛顿州地方卫生辖区在传染病调查、预防和控制方面的实践存在差异。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Nov;18(6):623-30. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182602f90.
9
Health information Hispanic outreach in the Texas Lower Rio Grande Valley.德克萨斯州下里奥格兰德河谷地区针对西班牙裔群体的健康信息推广活动。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):180-9.
10
An evaluation of a community-academic-clinical partnership to reduce prostate cancer disparities in the South.一项关于社区-学术-临床合作关系以减少美国南部前列腺癌差异的评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar;29(1):80-5. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0550-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of evaluation frameworks and their applicability to real-world physical activity and dietary change programme evaluation.评价框架及其在真实世界体力活动和膳食改变计划评价中的适用性的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09062-0.
2
Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.公共卫生领域最佳实践选择框架:一项系统文献综述
J Public Health Res. 2015 Nov 17;4(3):577. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.577.
3
Testing the recommendations of the Washington State Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan: the Moses Lake case study.检验华盛顿州营养与身体活动计划的建议:摩西湖案例研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A59. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.重新审视基于社区的健康促进:前景、成效与潜力。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):557-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.557.
2
Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research.扩大社区问题解决的参与度:一种支持协作实践与研究的多学科模式。
J Urban Health. 2003 Mar;80(1):14-47; discussion 48-60. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg014.
3
Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints.评估改善社区健康的伙伴关系:追踪足迹。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Feb;27(1):49-91. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-1-49.
4
Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage.伙伴关系协同效应:研究与强化合作优势的实用框架
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205, III-IV. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00203.
5
Environmental influences on eating and physical activity.环境对饮食和身体活动的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:309-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.309.
6
Minisymposium on obesity: overview and some strategic considerations.肥胖问题小型研讨会:概述与一些战略考量
Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:293-308. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.293.
7
Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity.剖析致胖环境:用于识别和优先考虑肥胖环境干预措施的框架的开发与应用
Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 1):563-70. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0585.
8
Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement.确定和界定社区能力的维度,为衡量提供基础。
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):258-78. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500303.
9
Evaluating a statewide partnership for reducing risks for chronic diseases.评估一项旨在降低慢性病风险的全州范围的合作项目。
J Community Health. 1997 Oct;22(5):343-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1025175504044.
10
An "ecological" approach to the obesity pandemic.应对肥胖流行的“生态”方法。
BMJ. 1997 Aug 23;315(7106):477-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7106.477.

华盛顿州健康社区项目中所使用的评估工具开发框架。

A framework for developing evaluation tools used in Washington State's Healthy Communities projects.

作者信息

Smith Lynne T, Johnson Donna B, Lamson Erica, Sitaker Marilyn

机构信息

Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash 98195, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A64. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

PMID:16539805
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1563958/
Abstract

Washington State's Healthy Communities pilot projects were developed to test approaches and recommendations of the Washington State Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan and to provide a statewide model for implementation. The Healthy Communities program included plans for ongoing process evaluation to ensure implementation. Two years into the first project, however, the evaluation team recognized that data for evaluation were inadequate to explain the experiences of the pilot community partnership. The team sought a framework through which to better understand how the community partnership functioned, including what worked well and how guidance and technical assistance could best be provided. The evaluation team identified the community health governance model of Lasker and Weiss through a literature search and applied this model to existing Healthy Communities project evaluation data. The team also designed a new survey tool based on the model and used it in the second pilot community. The new tool provides feedback to community partners to help guide project implementation and tests the applicability of a theoretical model to public health practice.

摘要

华盛顿州的健康社区试点项目旨在测试华盛顿州营养与身体活动计划的方法和建议,并为全州范围内的实施提供一个典范。健康社区项目包括持续进行过程评估的计划,以确保项目的实施。然而,在第一个项目开展两年后,评估团队认识到用于评估的数据不足以解释试点社区伙伴关系的经验。该团队寻求一个框架,以便更好地理解社区伙伴关系是如何运作的,包括哪些方面运作良好,以及如何能最好地提供指导和技术援助。评估团队通过文献检索确定了拉斯克和韦斯的社区卫生治理模型,并将该模型应用于现有的健康社区项目评估数据。该团队还基于该模型设计了一种新的调查工具,并在第二个试点社区中使用。这种新工具向社区伙伴提供反馈,以帮助指导项目实施,并测试一种理论模型在公共卫生实践中的适用性。