Amico K Rivet, Harman Jennifer J, Johnson Blair T
Center for Health/HIV Intervention and Prevention, University of Connecticut, 2006 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT 06269-1248, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Mar;41(3):285-97. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000197870.99196.ea.
To conduct a quantitative review of published trials of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence interventions.
A research synthesis of published ART adherence intervention outcome studies.
ART adherence intervention outcome studies meeting inclusion criteria published between 1996 and December 2004 (k=24).
Effect sizes (ESs [d]) were calculated for each study outcome, producing 25 immediate postintervention outcomes and an additional 13 follow-up ESs. Reported pre- to post-ART adherence between groups (k = 15) or within groups (k = 10) served as the main outcome converted to standardized ES.
ART adherence interventions had a small effect (d = 0.35, odds ratio [OR] = 1.88) that varied considerably across studies. Interventions that specifically enrolled participants with known or anticipated problems with ART adherence demonstrated medium effects on adherence (d = 0.62, OR = 3.07). Interventions that did not target their participants on similar criteria had quite small effects(d = 0.19, OR = 1.41). Adherence improvements showed no tendency to decay across time.
Outcomes of studies targeting those with poor ART adherence had stronger effects than those intervening with groups of individuals who were mixed in terms of pretest levels of adherence. Adherence intervention outcome studies must carefully delineate their target populations, because defining individuals as "on ART" does not provide the level of specificity needed to design and implement effective interventions.
对抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)依从性干预措施的已发表试验进行定量综述。
对已发表的ART依从性干预结果研究进行综合分析。
1996年至2004年12月期间发表的符合纳入标准的ART依从性干预结果研究(k = 24)。
计算每项研究结局的效应量(ESs [d]),得出25个干预后即时结局以及另外13个随访ESs。组间(k = 15)或组内(k = 10)报告的ART治疗前至治疗后的依从性作为主要结局,转换为标准化ES。
ART依从性干预措施有较小的效果(d = 0.35,优势比[OR] = 1.88),且各研究间差异很大。专门招募已知或预期存在ART依从性问题的参与者的干预措施对依从性有中等效果(d = 0.62,OR = 3.07)。未根据类似标准选择参与者的干预措施效果很小(d = 0.19,OR = 1.41)。依从性改善没有随时间衰减的趋势。
针对ART依从性差的人群的研究结果比针对依从性预测试水平参差不齐的个体群体进行干预的研究结果效果更强。依从性干预结果研究必须仔细界定其目标人群,因为将个体定义为“接受ART治疗”并不能提供设计和实施有效干预措施所需的特异性水平。