Jørgensen Michael Martini, Zachariae Robert
Psychooncology Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Apr;47(2):137-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00501.x.
Autonomic and affective responses to two different stress tasks were measured in 45 males and 74 females, categorized as repressive, true low-anxious, true high-anxious, and defensive high-anxious. Electrodermal activity (EDA) was used as a measure of sympathetic activity and the high frequency (HF) spectral component of heart rate variability as a measure of parasympathetic activity. Contrary to our predictions, reactivity of repressors did not differ from the reactivity of true low-anxious participants. The results draw attention to previous inconsistent findings within the literature on repressive coping style and autonomic nervous system dysregulation. It is suggested that future research could benefit from the use of more consistent operationalizations of the repressive coping construct and from comparing alternative measures of repressive coping within the same study.
对45名男性和74名女性进行了测量,这些人被分为压抑型、真正低焦虑型、真正高焦虑型和防御性高焦虑型,测量他们对两种不同压力任务的自主神经和情感反应。皮肤电活动(EDA)被用作交感神经活动的指标,心率变异性的高频(HF)频谱成分被用作副交感神经活动的指标。与我们的预测相反,压抑者的反应性与真正低焦虑参与者的反应性没有差异。这些结果提请注意以往文献中关于压抑应对方式和自主神经系统失调的不一致发现。建议未来的研究可以受益于对压抑应对结构使用更一致的操作化方法,并在同一研究中比较压抑应对的替代测量方法。