Maddi Salvatore R, Harvey Richard H, Khoshaba Deborah M, Lu John L, Persico Michele, Brow Marnie
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine 92697-7085, USA.
J Pers. 2006 Apr;74(2):575-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00385.x.
Previous research has established hardiness as a dispositional factor in preserving and enhancing performance and health despite stressful circumstances. The present four studies continue this construct-validational process by (a) introducing a shortened version of the hardiness measure and (b) testing hypotheses concerning the relationship between hardiness and repressive coping, right-wing authoritarianism, innovative behavior, and billable hours (a measure of consulting effectiveness). Results of these studies suggest the adequate reliability and validity of the Personal Views Survey III-R, which is the shortened, 18-item measure of hardiness. Further, results support the hypothesis that the relationship of hardiness is negative with repressive coping and right-wing authoritarianism and positive with innovative behavior and billable hours. Hardiness also appears unrelated to socially desirable responding.
以往的研究已将心理韧性确立为一种性格因素,它能让人在压力环境下保持并提升工作表现和健康水平。目前的四项研究通过以下方式延续了这一结构效度验证过程:(a)引入心理韧性测量的简化版本,以及(b)检验关于心理韧性与压抑应对、右翼威权主义、创新行为和计费时长(咨询有效性的一种衡量指标)之间关系的假设。这些研究结果表明,个人观点调查III-R具有足够的信度和效度,它是心理韧性的简化版,由18个项目组成。此外,研究结果支持了以下假设:心理韧性与压抑应对和右翼威权主义呈负相关,与创新行为和计费时长呈正相关。心理韧性似乎也与社会赞许性反应无关。