Loe E R, Bauer M L, Lardy G P
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, 58105, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2006 Apr;84(4):986-96. doi: 10.2527/2006.844986x.
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and barley, as well as the particle size of dry-rolled barley and corn, in finishing steer diets containing WCGF. In Exp. 1, 144 crossbred steers (initial BW = 298.9 +/- 1.4 kg) were used to evaluate barley (0.566 kg/L and 23.5% NDF for whole barley) and WCGF combinations in finishing diets containing 0, 17, 35, 52, or 69% WCGF (DM basis), replacing barley and concentrated separator byproduct. A sixth treatment consisted of corn (0.726 kg/L and 11.1% NDF for whole corn), replacing barley in the 35% WCGF treatment. In Exp. 2, 144 crossbred steers (initial BW = 315.0 +/- 1.5 kg) were used to evaluate coarse or fine, dry-rolled barley or corn (0.632 and 0.699 kg/L; 26.6 and 15.9% NDF for whole barley and corn, respectively) in finishing diets containing WCGF. A factorial treatment design was used; the factors were grain source (corn or barley) and degree of processing (coarse or fine). The diets contained 50% WCGF, 42% grain (corn or barley), 5% alfalfa hay, and 3% supplement (DM basis). In Exp. 1, DMI and ADG responded quadratically (P < or = 0.03), peaking at 35 and 52% WCGF, respectively. The efficiency of gain was not affected (P > or = 0.42) by dietary treatment. Steers fed dry-rolled corn and 35% WCGF had heavier HCW, lower DMI, greater ADG, increased G:F, increased s.c. fat thickness at the 12th rib, and greater yield grades compared with steers fed dry-rolled barley and 35% WCGF (P < or = 0.04). The apparent dietary NEg was similar among the barley and WCGF combinations (P > or = 0.51); however, the corn and 35% WCGF diet was 25% more energy dense (P < 0.001) than was the barley and 35% WCGF diet. In Exp. 2, no grain x processing interactions (P > or = 0.39) were observed. Particle size was 2.15 and 2.59 mm for fine- and coarse-rolled barley and was 1.90 and 3.23 mm for fine- and coarse-rolled corn. Steers fed a combination of corn and WCGF had increased ADG, greater G:F, heavier HCW, larger LM area, more s.c. fat thickness at the 12th rib, greater yield grades, increased marbling, and more KPH compared with steers fed a combination of barley and WCGF (P < or = 0.03). Fine-rolling of the grain increased fat thickness (P = 0.04). The addition of WCGF to the barley-based diets increased DMI and gain. Decreasing grain particle size did not greatly affect performance of the steers fed the 50% WCGF diets; however, carcasses from the steers fed the fine-rolled grain contained more fat.
进行了两项试验,以评估在含有湿玉米麸质饲料(WCGF)的育肥牛日粮中,WCGF与大麦的组合,以及干碾压大麦和玉米的粒度。在试验1中,使用144头杂交育肥牛(初始体重=298.9±1.4千克)来评估大麦(整粒大麦为0.566千克/升和23.5%中性洗涤纤维)与WCGF在含有0、17、35、52或69%WCGF(干物质基础)的育肥日粮中的组合,替代大麦和浓缩分离副产品。第六种处理是玉米(整粒玉米为0.726千克/升和11.1%中性洗涤纤维),替代35%WCGF处理中的大麦。在试验2中,使用144头杂交育肥牛(初始体重=315.0±1.5千克)来评估在含有WCGF的育肥日粮中,粗或细的干碾压大麦或玉米(0.632和0.699千克/升;整粒大麦和玉米的中性洗涤纤维分别为26.6%和15.9%)。采用析因处理设计;因素为谷物来源(玉米或大麦)和加工程度(粗或细)。日粮含有50%WCGF、42%谷物(玉米或大麦)、5%苜蓿干草和3%补充料(干物质基础)。在试验1中,干物质采食量(DMI)和平均日增重(ADG)呈二次反应(P≤0.03),分别在35%和52%WCGF时达到峰值。日粮处理对增重效率没有影响(P≥0.42)。与饲喂干碾压大麦和35%WCGF的育肥牛相比,饲喂干碾压玉米和35%WCGF的育肥牛有更重的热胴体重(HCW)、更低的DMI、更高的ADG、更高的料重比(G:F)、第12肋处皮下脂肪厚度增加以及更高的产肉等级(P≤0.04)。大麦和WCGF组合之间的表观日粮净能(NEg)相似(P≥0.51);然而,玉米和35%WCGF日粮的能量密度比大麦和35%WCGF日粮高25%(P<0.001)。在试验2中,未观察到谷物×加工的交互作用(P≥0.39)。细碾压和粗碾压大麦的粒度分别为2.15和2.59毫米,细碾压和粗碾压玉米的粒度分别为1.90和3.23毫米。与饲喂大麦和WCGF组合的育肥牛相比,饲喂玉米和WCGF组合的育肥牛有更高的ADG、更高的G:F、更重的HCW、更大的眼肌面积、第12肋处更多的皮下脂肪厚度、更高的产肉等级、更多的大理石花纹和更多的肾周脂肪(P≤0.03)。谷物的细碾压增加了脂肪厚度(P=0.04)。在以大麦为基础的日粮中添加WCGF增加了DMI和增重。降低谷物粒度对饲喂50%WCGF日粮的育肥牛的性能影响不大;然而,饲喂细碾压谷物的育肥牛的胴体含有更多脂肪。