Branco Filipe Polese, Ranali José, Ambrosano Gláucia M B, Volpato Maria Cristina
Graduate Student in Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutics, Dentistry School of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Paricicaba, Brazil.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Apr;101(4):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.005. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
This double-blind cross-over study compared the anesthetic success and onset and duration of lip and pulpal anesthesia of 0.5% bupivacaine and levobupivacaine solutions, both with 1:200,000 epinephrine, when administered for inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia. Thirty healthy volunteers were randomly anesthetized using one of the solutions. The inferior canine, second premolar, and molar were tested with electric stimulation. The pulpal anesthetic success rates for bupivacaine and levobupivacaine were 80% and 76.66%, respectively, for molars, 76.66% (both solutions) for premolars, and 70% (both solutions) for canines. At least 250 minutes of pulpal anesthesia was achieved. There were no significant differences between the solutions considering the measured parameters (P > .05). Because of the similar anesthetic behavior of the 2 solutions in this study and the low toxicity related in the literature for levobupivacaine, there is justification for replacing bupivacaine with levobupivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve local anesthesia.
这项双盲交叉研究比较了0.5%布比卡因溶液和左旋布比卡因溶液在加入1:200,000肾上腺素后用于下牙槽神经麻醉时的麻醉成功率、唇部和牙髓麻醉的起效时间及持续时间。30名健康志愿者被随机使用其中一种溶液进行麻醉。用电刺激测试下颌尖牙、第二前磨牙和磨牙。布比卡因和左旋布比卡因对磨牙的牙髓麻醉成功率分别为80%和76.66%,对前磨牙均为76.66%,对尖牙均为70%。至少实现了250分钟的牙髓麻醉。考虑到所测量的参数,两种溶液之间没有显著差异(P>.05)。由于本研究中两种溶液的麻醉行为相似,且文献中报道左旋布比卡因的毒性较低,因此有理由用左旋布比卡因替代布比卡因用于下牙槽神经局部麻醉。