Dutta Arjun P, Daftary Monika N, Oke Fisayo, Mims Beverly, Hailemeskel Bisrat, Sansgiry Sujit S
Howard University School of Pharmacy, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
Consult Pharm. 2005 Jan;20(1):45-52. doi: 10.4140/tcp.n.2005.45.
The objective of this study was to assess the structure, resources, and activities of academic geriatrics courses in U.S. pharmacy schools.
A cross-sectional study.
Schools of pharmacy in the United States identified through the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP). The survey was e-mailed (May 2003) to the academic chairs of the clinical pharmacy department and/or the head of geriatric pharmacy practice at each of the 84 schools of pharmacy in the United States.
The primary measure was to assess the nature and extent of geriatrics course content in the responding schools. In addition, we elicited information on the type of geriatrics material taught, faculty involvement, student population, type of school, academic requirements, and experiential education. The questionnaire items were based on the current course content in geriatrics courses taught at the institution. Content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by administering the survey to three survey experts (including one in geriatrics); their suggestions were incorporated in redesigning the questionnaire.
A total of 42 (50%) out of 84 schools responded. All responding schools had some form of geriatric education incorporated into their curriculum. However, the depth and breadth of the geriatric curriculum reported by the responding schools did not seem to be that different from results obtained by a 1985-1986 survey.
Geriatric education in pharmacy schools has not increased proportionally with the expected increase in the geriatric population in the United States. Schools of pharmacy should make geriatric education a priority because the majority of patients whom pharmacists need to monitor or counsel currently are, and will continue to be, 65 years and older. Compared with a past study, the focus of current geriatrics education in pharmacy schools does not seem to have improved much despite the increasing need for geriatric practitioners and drug misadventures in the elderly.
本研究旨在评估美国药学院校老年医学课程的结构、资源及活动。
横断面研究。
通过美国药学院校协会(AACP)确定的美国药学院校。2003年5月,调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给美国84所药学院校临床药学系的学术主任和/或老年药学实践负责人。
主要测量指标是评估回复院校中老年医学课程内容的性质和范围。此外,我们还收集了有关所教授老年医学材料的类型、教师参与情况、学生群体、院校类型、学术要求及实践教育的信息。问卷项目基于该机构所教授的老年医学课程的当前课程内容。通过向三位调查专家(包括一位老年医学专家)进行调查来评估问卷的内容效度;他们的建议被纳入问卷的重新设计中。
84所院校中共有42所(50%)回复。所有回复院校在其课程中都纳入了某种形式的老年医学教育。然而,回复院校报告的老年医学课程的深度和广度似乎与1985 - 1986年调查所得结果并无太大差异。
药学院校的老年医学教育并未随着美国老年人口预期的增加而成比例增加。药学院校应将老年医学教育作为优先事项,因为药剂师目前需要监测或咨询的大多数患者现在是且将来仍会是65岁及以上的老年人。与过去的一项研究相比,尽管对老年医学从业者的需求不断增加且老年人用药不良事件增多,但目前药学院校老年医学教育的重点似乎并未有太大改善。