• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题赌博治疗研究结果报告框架:《艾伯塔省班夫共识》

A framework for reporting outcomes in problem gambling treatment research: the Banff, Alberta Consensus.

作者信息

Walker Michael, Toneatto Tony, Potenza Marc N, Petry Nancy, Ladouceur Robert, Hodgins David C, el-Guebaly Nady, Echeburua Enrique, Blaszczynski Alex

机构信息

University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):504-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01341.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01341.x
PMID:16548930
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective is provide a framework concerning the minimum features of reporting efficacy of treatment in the problem gambling field. Research to date has not used uniform outcome measures and it is, therefore, difficult to compare the relative efficacy of various approaches. Some studies emphasize self-reported behavioural measures such as frequency and intensity of gambling whereas others emphasise change with respect to the criteria used to diagnose problem gambling or use composite measures of symptom severity in multiple domains involving gambling-related thoughts, urges, and behaviours.

METHODS

An expert panel consensus.

RESULTS

The proposed minimum features of reporting the efficacy of treatment outcome studies are: measures of gambling behaviour - the net expenditure each month, the frequency (in days per month) with which gambling takes place, and the time spent thinking about or engaged in the pursuit of gambling each month; measures of the problems caused by gambling - especially problems in the areas of personal health, relationships, financial, and legal; these measures can be complemented by additional measures of quality of life. measures of the processes of change - whatever mechanisms of change are assumed to occur.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that these guidelines are broad enough to allow clinical research conducted from diverse perspectives to allow valid cross study evaluations of intervention studies. Such conditions will facilitate the development of empirically validated best practice guidelines for use by clinicians in the management of problem gambling.

摘要

目的

目的是提供一个关于报告问题赌博领域治疗效果的最低限度特征的框架。迄今为止的研究尚未使用统一的结果测量方法,因此,难以比较各种方法的相对疗效。一些研究强调自我报告的行为测量方法,如赌博的频率和强度,而另一些研究则强调在用于诊断问题赌博的标准方面的变化,或使用涉及赌博相关想法、冲动和行为的多个领域的症状严重程度综合测量方法。

方法

专家小组达成共识。

结果

报告治疗结果研究疗效的拟议最低限度特征为:赌博行为测量指标——每月净支出、赌博发生的频率(每月天数)以及每月花在思考或参与赌博上的时间;赌博造成的问题测量指标——特别是个人健康、人际关系、财务和法律方面的问题;这些测量指标可以通过生活质量的额外测量指标加以补充。变化过程测量指标——无论假定发生何种变化机制。

结论

我们认为,这些指导方针足够宽泛,能够允许从不同角度开展临床研究,从而对干预研究进行有效的跨研究评估。此类情况将有助于制定经实证验证的最佳实践指南,供临床医生在管理问题赌博时使用。

相似文献

1
A framework for reporting outcomes in problem gambling treatment research: the Banff, Alberta Consensus.问题赌博治疗研究结果报告框架:《艾伯塔省班夫共识》
Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):504-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01341.x.
2
A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling.女性病理性赌博的个体认知行为治疗与团体认知行为治疗比较
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Sep;45(9):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
3
Association between posttreatment gambling behavior and harm in pathological gamblers.病态赌徒治疗后赌博行为与危害之间的关联。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;21(2):185-93. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.2.185.
4
Recovery in pathological gambling: an imprecise concept.病理性赌博的康复:一个不精确的概念。
Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12-13):1844-64. doi: 10.1080/10826080802285810.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Development and psychometric evaluation of the gambling treatment outcome monitoring system (GAMTOMS).赌博治疗结果监测系统(GAMTOMS)的开发与心理测量评估。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;21(2):174-84. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.2.174.
7
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
Measuring gambling participation.测量赌博参与度。
Addiction. 2009 Jul;104(7):1065-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02412.x. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
9
Exposure therapy for problem gambling in rural communities: a program model and early outcomes.农村社区问题赌博的暴露疗法:一种项目模式及早期成效
Aust J Rural Health. 2011 Jun;19(3):142-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01199.x.
10
Measuring treatment outcomes in gambling disorders: a systematic review.评估赌博障碍的治疗效果:系统综述。
Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):411-426. doi: 10.1111/add.13968. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Significance of Psychiatric Comorbidities Among Outpatients With Gambling Disorder in Japan: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.日本赌博障碍门诊患者精神共病的临床意义:一项为期12个月的随访研究。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Jun;45(2):e70016. doi: 10.1002/npr2.70016.
2
Striving Towards National Lower-Risk Gambling Guidelines: An Empirical Investigation Among a Sample of Swedish Gamblers.朝着国家低风险赌博指南努力:对瑞典赌徒样本的实证研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jan 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10372-w.
3
Developing a utility value set for the Gambling Quality of Life Scale-Brief (GQoLS-Brief) using a discrete choice experiment.
使用离散选择实验为简明赌博生活质量量表(GQoLS-Brief)制定效用价值集。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03835-5. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
4
Introducing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Gambling Disorder in Routine Addiction Care: Comparative Cohort Study.在常规成瘾治疗中引入和评估在线认知行为疗法治疗赌博障碍的效果:比较队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 18;26:e54754. doi: 10.2196/54754.
5
Systematic Assessment of Gambling Type Involvement: Reliability and Validity of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT).赌博类型参与的系统评估:赌博障碍识别测试(GDIT)的信度和效度
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10345-z. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
An International, Multidisciplinary Consensus Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures for Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.一份关于物质相关及成瘾性障碍的以患者为中心的国际多学科共识结局指标集。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 8;13(7):2154. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072154.
7
Definitions and assessments of recovery from gambling disorder: A scoping review.赌博障碍康复的定义和评估:范围综述。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Mar 29;13(2):354-412. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00008. Print 2024 Jun 26.
8
Towards a conceptual framework for the prevention of gambling-related harms: Findings from a scoping review.迈向预防赌博相关危害的概念框架:综述研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 22;19(3):e0298005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298005. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessing gambling disorder using frequency- and time-based response options: A Rasch analysis of the gambling disorder identification test.使用基于频率和时间的反应选项评估赌博障碍:赌博障碍识别测试的 Rasch 分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Mar;33(1):e2018. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2018.
10
Evaluating the impact of motivational interviewing on engagement and outcomes in a web-based self-help intervention for gambling disorder: A randomised controlled trial.评估动机性访谈对基于网络的赌博障碍自助干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2024 Jan 4;35:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100707. eCollection 2024 Mar.