• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing gambling disorder using frequency- and time-based response options: A Rasch analysis of the gambling disorder identification test.使用基于频率和时间的反应选项评估赌博障碍:赌博障碍识别测试的 Rasch 分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Mar;33(1):e2018. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2018.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making.超短心理健康筛查工具具有有效性和可靠性,并且具有附加价值,可以支持决策。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):59-70. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002718. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
6
Measurement of level of PTSD with the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ): bias and precision when using full ordinal or dichotomized items.使用国际创伤问卷(ITQ)测量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)水平:使用完整有序项目或二分项目时的偏差和精密度。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2514873. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2514873. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015456.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing Persistent Versus Episodic Clusters of At-Risk Respondents on the Problem Gambling Severity Index.在问题赌博严重程度指数上区分高危受访者的持续性与间歇性集群。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10386-y.
2
Striving Towards National Lower-Risk Gambling Guidelines: An Empirical Investigation Among a Sample of Swedish Gamblers.朝着国家低风险赌博指南努力:对瑞典赌徒样本的实证研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jan 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10372-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Gambling Disorder Using Semistructured Interviews or Self-Report? Evaluation of the Structured Clinical Interview for Gambling Disorder Among Swedish Gamblers.使用半结构化访谈或自我报告评估赌博障碍?瑞典赌徒中赌博障碍定式临床访谈的评估。
Assessment. 2023 Dec;30(8):2387-2397. doi: 10.1177/10731911221147038. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
2
Clarifying gambling subtypes: the revised pathways model of problem gambling.澄清赌博亚型:问题赌博的修订途径模型。
Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):2000-2008. doi: 10.1111/add.15745. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
The Gambling Disorders Identification Test (GDIT): Psychometric Evaluation of a New Comprehensive Measure for Gambling Disorder and Problem Gambling.赌博障碍识别测试(GDIT):一种新的全面赌博障碍和问题赌博衡量标准的心理测量评估。
Assessment. 2023 Jan;30(1):225-237. doi: 10.1177/10731911211046045. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process.赌博障碍识别测试的制定:一项国际德尔菲法和共识研究的结果。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;30(2):e1865. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1865. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
5
A systematic review evaluating screening instruments for gambling disorder finds lack of adequate evidence.一项评估赌博障碍筛查工具的系统评价发现,缺乏充分的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;120:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
The diagnostic accuracy of brief screening instruments for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.简短筛查工具诊断赌博问题的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;74:101784. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101784. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (G-DIT): Protocol for a Delphi Method Study.赌博障碍识别测试(G-DIT)的开发:德尔菲法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):e12006. doi: 10.2196/12006.
8
Locating gambling problems across a continuum of severity: Rasch analysis of the Quinte Longitudinal Study (QLS).定位严重程度连续体中的赌博问题:魁北克纵向研究(QLS)的 Rasch 分析。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Gambling disorder, DSM-5 criteria and symptom severity.赌博障碍、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版标准及症状严重程度
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 May;75:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中赌博障碍诊断标准的信度、效度和分类准确性及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的比较
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Sep;32(3):905-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7.

使用基于频率和时间的反应选项评估赌博障碍:赌博障碍识别测试的 Rasch 分析。

Assessing gambling disorder using frequency- and time-based response options: A Rasch analysis of the gambling disorder identification test.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Mar;33(1):e2018. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2018.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.2018
PMID:38475935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10933385/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT) is a recently developed self-report measure. The GDIT includes items with multiple response options that are either based on frequency or time, and item response theory evaluations of these could yield vital knowledge on its measurement performance.

METHODS

The GDIT was evaluated using Rasch analysis in a study involving 597 Swedish gamblers.

RESULTS

In a three-dimensional Rasch model, the item response difficulty range extended from -1.88 to 4.06 and increased with higher time- and frequency-based responses. Differential item functioning showed that some GDIT items displayed age and gender-related differences. Additionally, person-separation reliability indicated the GDIT could reliably be divided into three to four diagnostic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency- and time-based item response options of the GDIT offer excellent measurement, allowing for elaborate assessment across both lower and higher gambling severity. The GDIT can be used to detect DSM-5 Gambling Disorder, thereby holding significance from both epidemiological and clinical standpoints. Notably, the 3-item GDIT Gambling Behavior subscale also shows potential as a brief screening tool for identifying at-risk gambling behavior.

摘要

目的

赌博障碍识别测试(GDIT)是一种新开发的自我报告测量工具。GDIT 包含基于频率或时间的多项选择项目,对这些项目的项目反应理论评估可以为其测量性能提供重要的知识。

方法

在一项涉及 597 名瑞典赌徒的研究中,使用 RASCH 分析对 GDIT 进行了评估。

结果

在三维 RASCH 模型中,项目反应难度范围从-1.88 到 4.06,并且随着基于时间和频率的更高响应而增加。差异项目功能显示,一些 GDIT 项目显示出与年龄和性别相关的差异。此外,个体分离可靠性表明,GDIT 可以可靠地分为三到四个诊断水平。

结论

GDIT 的基于频率和时间的项目反应选项提供了极好的测量,允许在较低和较高的赌博严重程度上进行精细评估。GDIT 可用于检测 DSM-5 赌博障碍,因此从流行病学和临床角度来看都具有重要意义。值得注意的是,3 项 GDIT 赌博行为分量表也有可能成为识别高危赌博行为的简短筛查工具。