Oliveira C H, Medeiros Silva R, Santagada V, Caliendo G, Perissutti E, Prado Galuppo M, Marcondes Rezende V, Barrientos-Astigarraga R E, Mendes G Duarte, De Nucci G
Cartesius Development of Clinical Research, Caminas, Brazil.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar;44(3):142-8. doi: 10.5414/cpp44142.
To compare the bioavailability of two potassic losartan immediate release tablet (50 mg) formulations (Losartan from Laboratórios Cristália Ltd., Brazil, as a test formulation and Cozaar from Merck Sharp & Dohme Farmacêutica Ltd., Brazil, as a reference formulation) in 25 volunteers of both sexes.
The study was conducted in an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design and a 1-week washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-hour interval. The concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite losartan acid were analyzed by combined reversed phase liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with negative ion electrospray ionization using a selected ion monitoring method. From the losartan and losartan acid plasma concentrations vs. time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUClast, AUC0-inf and Cmax.
The geometric mean and respective 90% confidence interval (CI) of Losartan/Cozaar losartan percent ratios were 92.9% (82.2-105.0%) for Cmax, 99.0% (92.5-105.9%) for AUClast, and 99.1% (92.7-105.8%) for AUC0-inf. Furthermore, the geometric mean and respective 90% CI of Losartan/Cozaar losartan acid percent ratios were 98.5% (91.5-106.0%) for Cmax, 97.9% (93.3 102.7%) for AUClast, and 98.1% (93.6-102.9%) for AUC0-inf.
Since the 90% CI for Cmax, AUClast and AUC0-inf were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that the potassic losartan immediate release 50 mg tablet was bioequivalent to the Cozaar immediate release 50 mg tablet, according to both the rate and extent of absorption. While there were no significant differences in the bioequivalence assessed by either losartan or losartan acid, future bioequivalence studies on losartan may be performed by quantifying losartan alone as the parent compounds are more discriminative.
比较两种50毫克氯沙坦速释片制剂(巴西克里斯塔利亚实验室生产的氯沙坦作为试验制剂,巴西默克夏普&多贺美制药有限公司生产的科素亚作为参比制剂)在25名男女志愿者中的生物利用度。
本研究采用开放、随机、两周期交叉设计,洗脱期为1周。在24小时间隔内采集血浆样本。采用反相液相色谱-串联质谱联用(LC-MS-MS)和负离子电喷雾电离,通过选择离子监测法分析氯沙坦及其活性代谢产物氯沙坦酸的浓度。从氯沙坦和氯沙坦酸的血浆浓度-时间曲线中获得以下药代动力学参数:末次浓度时间曲线下面积(AUClast)、零至无穷大浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC0-inf)和峰浓度(Cmax)。
氯沙坦/科素亚氯沙坦百分比比值的几何均值及各自的90%置信区间(CI)为:Cmax为92.9%(82.2 - 105.0%),AUClast为99.0%(92.5 - 105.9%),AUC0-inf为99.1%(92.7 - 105.8%)。此外,氯沙坦/科素亚氯沙坦酸百分比比值的几何均值及各自的90%CI为:Cmax为98.5%(91.5 - 106.0%),AUClast为97.9%(93.3 - 102.7%),AUC0-inf为98.1%(93.6 - 102.9%)。
由于Cmax、AUClast和AUC0-inf的90%CI在美国食品药品监督管理局提出的80% - 125%区间内,根据吸收速率和程度得出结论:50毫克氯沙坦速释片与50毫克科素亚速释片生物等效。虽然氯沙坦或氯沙坦酸评估的生物等效性无显著差异,但由于母体化合物更具鉴别力,未来氯沙坦的生物等效性研究可仅通过定量氯沙坦进行。