Roberson Quinetta M, Stevens Cynthia Kay
Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):379-91. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.379.
To discern patterns of employee sense-making about workplace diversity, the authors analyzed 751 natural language accounts of diversity incidents from 712 workers in one department of a large organization. Six generic incident types emerged: discrimination, representation, treatment by management, work relationships, respect between groups, and diversity climates. Consistent with hypotheses, incidents that respondents viewed as negative, accounts from women, and those involving members of respondents' in-groups were more likely to cite justice issues. Partially consistent with research on the linguistic intergroup bias, both negative and positive accounts involving out-group members and accounts from men were more likely to be expressed using abstract verb forms. The authors discuss future opportunities to integrate research on diversity, justice, and the linguistic category model.
为了识别员工对职场多样性的认知模式,作者分析了来自一个大型组织中一个部门的712名员工的751份关于多样性事件的自然语言描述。出现了六种一般事件类型:歧视、代表性、管理层的对待方式、工作关系、群体间的尊重以及多样性氛围。与假设一致,被受访者视为负面的事件、女性的描述以及涉及受访者内群体成员的事件更有可能提及公平问题。部分与语言群体间偏见的研究一致,涉及外群体成员的负面和正面描述以及男性的描述更有可能使用抽象动词形式来表达。作者讨论了整合多样性、公平和语言类别模型研究的未来机会。