• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仆人式领导、程序公正氛围、服务氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为:跨层次调查。

Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation.

机构信息

Department of Management, W P Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4006, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):517-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018867.

DOI:10.1037/a0018867
PMID:20476830
Abstract

This study tests the influence of servant leadership on 2 group climates, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior. Results from a sample of 815 employees and 123 immediate supervisors revealed that commitment to the supervisor, self-efficacy, procedural justice climate, and service climate partially mediated the relationship between servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Cross-level interaction results revealed that procedural justice climate and positive service climate amplified the influence of commitment to the supervisor on organizational citizenship behavior. Implications of these results for theory and practice and directions for future research are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在检验仆人式领导对两种群体氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为的影响。本研究样本包括 815 名员工和 123 名直接主管,结果表明,对主管的承诺、自我效能感、程序公正氛围和服务氛围在一定程度上中介了仆人式领导与组织公民行为之间的关系。跨层次交互作用的结果表明,程序公正氛围和积极的服务氛围放大了对主管的承诺对组织公民行为的影响。讨论了这些结果对理论和实践的意义以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation.仆人式领导、程序公正氛围、服务氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为:跨层次调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):517-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018867.
2
The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.主动人格在工作满意度和组织公民行为中的作用:关系视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):395-404. doi: 10.1037/a0018079.
3
The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework.公平氛围和公平取向对工作成果的影响:一个跨层次多焦点框架。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):242-56. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242.
4
Procedural justice climate and group power distance: an examination of cross-level interaction effects.程序正义氛围与群体权力距离:跨层次交互效应考察
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):681-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681.
5
Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.事件公平感认知与员工反应:社会实体公平感认知作为调节变量
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):513-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.
6
Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships.转变服务员工与服务氛围:对构建长期服务关系中变革型领导的多层次、多源考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1006-19. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1006.
7
Mediating effect of cooperative norm in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors from procedural justice climate.合作规范在程序公正氛围预测组织公民行为中的中介作用。
Psychol Rep. 2007 Aug;101(1):67-78. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.1.67-78.
8
Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model.辱虐管理的前因与后果:涓滴效应模型的检验
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):191-201. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191.
9
Differentiated leader-member exchanges: the buffering role of justice climate.差异化的领导-成员交换:公正氛围的缓冲作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1104-20. doi: 10.1037/a0020578.
10
Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership.团队效力和团队效能的前因:对目标和过程清晰度及仆人式领导的检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):851-62. doi: 10.1037/a0022465.

引用本文的文献

1
Competence and control beliefs in three cultures: a German personality test applied at home, in Kenya and Poland.三种文化中的能力与控制信念:一项在德国、肯尼亚和波兰国内应用的人格测试
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 10;13(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03416-2.
2
Pipe up or clam up: the double-edged sword effect of perceived overqualification on employee voice behavior.要么畅所欲言,要么保持沉默:感知到的资历过高对员工建言行为的双刃剑效应。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1632774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1632774. eCollection 2025.
3
Servant Leadership: a Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis.
仆人式领导:系统文献综述与网络分析
Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2022;34(3):267-289. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09381-3. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Impact of Servant Leadership on the Work Environment and the Attitudes and Behavior of Nursing Professionals as a Function of Gender: A Systematic Review.仆人式领导对工作环境以及护理专业人员态度和行为的影响:基于性别的函数关系——一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2025 May 29;2025:8825138. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8825138. eCollection 2025.
5
The dilemma of frontline servant leadership: The conflict between top management directives and grassroots employee wellbeing and retention.一线仆人式领导的困境:高层管理指令与基层员工福祉及留任意愿之间的冲突。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0323811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323811. eCollection 2025.
6
The Influence of Mission Valence on Faculty's Voice Behavior: The Role of Thriving at Work and Servant Leadership.使命效价对教师建言行为的影响:工作蓬勃发展和仆人式领导的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;14(12):1214. doi: 10.3390/bs14121214.
7
The relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and nurses' silence: a cross-sectional study.强制公民行为与护士沉默之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 6;24(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02677-3.
8
Developing Servant Leadership through Experience and Practice: A Case Study in Service Learning.通过经验与实践培养仆人式领导:服务学习的一个案例研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(9):801. doi: 10.3390/bs14090801.
9
Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: the role of employee work reflection and employee proactive personality.仆人式领导与员工建言行为:员工工作反思与员工积极人格的作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1421412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1421412. eCollection 2024.
10
Linking servant leadership to followers' thriving at work: self-determination theory perspective.从自我决定理论视角看仆人式领导与员工工作蓬勃发展的关联
Front Psychol. 2024 May 16;15:1384110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384110. eCollection 2024.