Becker Diane M, Segal Jodi, Vaidya Dhananjay, Yanek Lisa R, Herrera-Galeano J Enrique, Bray Paul F, Moy Taryn F, Becker Lewis C, Faraday Nauder
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.
JAMA. 2006 Mar 22;295(12):1420-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.12.1420.
Recent randomized trials suggest that women may not accrue the same cardioprotective benefits as men do from low-dose aspirin therapy used in primary prevention. Failure of aspirin to suppress platelet aggregation in women is one hypothesized mechanism.
To examine differential platelet reactivity to low-dose aspirin therapy by sex.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A clinical trial of aspirin at 81 mg/d for 14 days was conducted in 571 men and 711 women. Baseline and post-aspirin therapy measures included platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, epinephrine, and platelet function analyzer closure time.
Sex differences in cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1) direct and indirect platelet activation pathways before and after administration of aspirin.
In 10 of the 12 platelet agonist exposures, women's platelets were significantly more reactive at baseline. However, after aspirin therapy, the percent aggregation to arachidonic acid (the direct COX-1 pathway) decreased more in women than in men (P<.001) and demonstrated near total suppression of residual platelet reactivity in both men and women. In COX-1 indirect pathways, women experienced the same or more platelet inhibition than men in 8 of the 9 assays yet retained modestly greater platelet reactivity after aspirin therapy. In multivariable analysis, female sex significantly predicted aggregation to 2 muM and 10 muM of adenosine diphosphate (P = .02 and <.001, respectively) and collagen at 5 mug/mL (P<.001) independent of risk factors, age, race, menopausal status, and hormone therapy.
Women experienced the same or greater decreases in platelet reactivity after aspirin therapy, retaining modestly more platelet reactivity compared with men. However, most women achieved total suppression of aggregation in the direct COX-1 pathway, the putative mechanism for aspirin's cardioprotection.
近期的随机试验表明,在一级预防中使用低剂量阿司匹林治疗时,女性可能无法获得与男性相同的心脏保护益处。阿司匹林无法抑制女性血小板聚集是一种假设机制。
研究性别对低剂量阿司匹林治疗的血小板反应性差异。
设计、地点和参与者:对571名男性和711名女性进行了一项为期14天、每日服用81毫克阿司匹林的临床试验。阿司匹林治疗前后的基线测量包括血小板对花生四烯酸、二磷酸腺苷、肾上腺素的聚集以及血小板功能分析仪封闭时间。
服用阿司匹林前后环氧化酶1(COX-1)直接和间接血小板激活途径的性别差异。
在12次血小板激动剂暴露中的10次中,女性血小板在基线时反应性显著更高。然而,阿司匹林治疗后,女性对花生四烯酸(直接COX-1途径)的聚集百分比下降幅度大于男性(P<.001),并且在男性和女性中均显示出对残余血小板反应性的近乎完全抑制。在COX-1间接途径中,在9项检测中的8项中,女性经历的血小板抑制与男性相同或更多,但在阿司匹林治疗后仍保留略高的血小板反应性。在多变量分析中,女性性别显著预测了对2微摩尔和10微摩尔二磷酸腺苷(分别为P =.02和<.001)以及5微克/毫升胶原蛋白的聚集(P<.001),独立于风险因素、年龄、种族、绝经状态和激素治疗。
阿司匹林治疗后,女性的血小板反应性下降幅度相同或更大,与男性相比仍保留略多的血小板反应性。然而,大多数女性在直接COX-1途径中实现了聚集的完全抑制,这是阿司匹林心脏保护的假定机制。