• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一份药物治疗委员会认证考试备考手册中,研究既定的多项选择题应试线索对题目作答的潜在影响:一项试点研究。

Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.

作者信息

Gettig Jacob P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Apr;26(4):558-62. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.4.558.

DOI:10.1592/phco.26.4.558
PMID:16553516
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of established multiple-choice test-taking correct and incorrect answer cues in the American College of Clinical Pharmacy's Updates in Therapeutics: The Pharmacotherapy Preparatory Course, 2005 Edition, as an equal or lesser surrogate indication of the prevalence of such cues in the Pharmacotherapy board certification examination.

METHODS

All self-assessment and patient case question-and-answer sets were assessed individually to determine if they were subject to selected correct and incorrect answer cues commonly seen in multiple-choice question writing. If the question was considered evaluable, correct answer cues-longest answer, mid-range number, one of two similar choices, and one of two opposite choices-were tallied. In addition, incorrect answer cues- inclusionary language and grammatical mismatch-were also tallied. Each cue was counted if it did what was expected or did the opposite of what was expected. Multiple cues could be identified in each question.

RESULTS

A total of 237 (47.7%) of 497 questions in the manual were deemed evaluable. A total of 325 correct answer cues and 35 incorrect answer cues were identified in the 237 evaluable questions. Most evaluable questions contained one to two correct and/or incorrect answer cue(s). Longest answer was the most frequently identified correct answer cue; however, it was the least likely to identify the correct answer. Inclusionary language was the most frequently identified incorrect answer cue. Incorrect answer cues were considerably more likely to identify incorrect answer choices than correct answer cues were able to identify correct answer choices.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of established multiple-choice test-taking cues is unlikely to be of significant help when taking the Pharmacotherapy board certification examination, primarily because of the lack of questions subject to such cues and the inability of correct answer cues to accurately identify correct answers. Incorrect answer cues, especially the use of inclusionary language, almost always will accurately identify an incorrect answer choice. Assuming that questions in the preparatory course manual were equal or lesser surrogates of those in the board certification examination, it is unlikely that intuition alone can replace adequate preparation and studying as the sole determinant of examination success.

摘要

目的

确定美国临床药学院《治疗学进展:药物治疗预备课程》2005年版中既定的多项选择题答题正确和错误线索的出现频率,作为药物治疗委员会认证考试中此类线索出现频率的等同或更低替代指标。

方法

对所有自我评估和患者病例问答集进行单独评估,以确定它们是否存在多项选择题编写中常见的特定正确和错误答题线索。如果问题被认为可评估,则统计正确答案线索(最长答案、中等范围数字、两个相似选项之一、两个相反选项之一)。此外,还统计错误答案线索(包容性语言和语法不匹配)。如果线索符合预期或与预期相反,则进行计数。每个问题中可能识别出多个线索。

结果

手册中的497个问题中,共有237个(47.7%)被认为可评估。在237个可评估问题中,共识别出325个正确答案线索和35个错误答案线索。大多数可评估问题包含一到两个正确和/或错误答案线索。最长答案是最常被识别出的正确答案线索;然而,它最不可能识别出正确答案。包容性语言是最常被识别出的错误答案线索。错误答案线索比正确答案线索更有可能识别出错误答案选项。

结论

在参加药物治疗委员会认证考试时,使用既定的多项选择题答题线索不太可能有显著帮助,主要原因是此类线索适用的问题较少,且正确答案线索无法准确识别正确答案。错误答案线索,尤其是包容性语言的使用,几乎总能准确识别出错误答案选项。假设预备课程手册中的问题是委员会认证考试问题的等同或更低替代指标,仅靠直觉不太可能取代充分的准备和学习,成为考试成功的唯一决定因素。

相似文献

1
Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.在一份药物治疗委员会认证考试备考手册中,研究既定的多项选择题应试线索对题目作答的潜在影响:一项试点研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Apr;26(4):558-62. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.4.558.
2
Validity of scoring 'dangerous answers' on a written certification examination.书面资格考试中对“危险答案”评分的有效性。
J Med Educ. 1987 Aug;62(8):625-31.
3
Preparation for the pharmacotherapy specialty certification examination: are question cues enough?药物治疗专业认证考试的备考:问题提示是否足够?
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Nov;26(11):1675-6; discussion 1676-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.11.1675.
4
Nonrestricted multiple-choice examination items.非限定性多项选择题
J Dent Educ. 1982 Aug;46(8):485-8.
5
The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.高风险护理评估中使用的多项选择题的题目编写缺陷频率。
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):662-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
6
Pharmacotherapy specialty certification examination. IV. 1992 results and process modifications, including recertification. The 1992 Specialty Council on Pharmacotherapy, Board of Pharmaceutical Specialties.药物治疗专业认证考试。四、1992年的结果及流程改进,包括重新认证。1992年药物治疗专业委员会,药学专业委员会。
Pharmacotherapy. 1993 May-Jun;13(3):262-6.
7
Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.在口腔颌面病理学课程的多项选择题考试中,对猜测因素进行校正可提高效度。
J Dent Educ. 2006 Apr;70(4):378-86.
8
[Method for calculating the distribution of randomly expected scores in a false-true-do not know-type of test].[在真假未知型测试中计算随机期望分数分布的方法]
Rev Invest Clin. 1989 Oct-Dec;41(4):375-9.
9
Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.计算机化医学评估中长菜单式问题与开放式问题的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Oct 10;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50.
10
A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.对多项选择题使用情况的重新评估。
Med Teach. 1993;15(2-3):237-42.