Tarrant Marie, Knierim Aimee, Hayes Sasha K, Ware James
Department of Nursing Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William M.W. Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong.
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):662-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
Multiple-choice questions are a common assessment method in nursing examinations. Few nurse educators, however, have formal preparation in constructing multiple-choice questions. Consequently, questions used in baccalaureate nursing assessments often contain item-writing flaws, or violations to accepted item-writing guidelines. In one nursing department, 2770 MCQs were collected from tests and examinations administered over a five-year period from 2001 to 2005. Questions were evaluated for 19 frequently occurring item-writing flaws, for cognitive level, for question source, and for the distribution of correct answers. Results show that almost half (46.2%) of the questions contained violations of item-writing guidelines and over 90% were written at low cognitive levels. Only a small proportion of questions were teacher generated (14.1%), while 36.2% were taken from testbanks and almost half (49.4%) had no source identified. MCQs written at a lower cognitive level were significantly more likely to contain item-writing flaws. While there was no relationship between the source of the question and item-writing flaws, teacher-generated questions were more likely to be written at higher cognitive levels (p<0.001). Correct answers were evenly distributed across all four options and no bias was noted in the placement of correct options. Further training in item-writing is recommended for all faculty members who are responsible for developing tests. Pre-test review and quality assessment is also recommended to reduce the occurrence of item-writing flaws and to improve the quality of test questions.
多项选择题是护理考试中常用的一种评估方法。然而,很少有护理教育工作者接受过编写多项选择题的正规培训。因此,本科护理评估中使用的问题往往存在题目编写缺陷,或者违反了公认的题目编写准则。在一个护理系,从2001年到2005年的五年时间里,从测试和考试中收集了2770道多项选择题。对这些问题进行了评估,检查是否存在19种常见的题目编写缺陷、认知水平、问题来源以及正确答案的分布情况。结果显示,几乎一半(46.2%)的问题存在违反题目编写准则的情况,超过90%的问题编写的认知水平较低。只有一小部分问题是教师编写的(14.1%),而36.2%是从题库中选取的,几乎一半(49.4%)的问题来源不明。认知水平较低的多项选择题更有可能存在题目编写缺陷。虽然问题来源与题目编写缺陷之间没有关系,但教师编写的问题更有可能具有较高的认知水平(p<0.001)。正确答案在所有四个选项中均匀分布,在正确选项的位置上没有发现偏差。建议对所有负责出题的教员进行题目编写方面的进一步培训。还建议进行预测试审查和质量评估,以减少题目编写缺陷的出现,提高试题质量。