Eldaghayes Ibrahim, Rothwell Lisa, Williams Andrew, Withers David, Balu Sucharitha, Davison Fred, Kaiser Pete
Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Viral Immunol. 2006 Spring;19(1):83-91. doi: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.83.
Little is understood about the immune responses involved in the pathogenesis of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Strains of IBDV differ in their virulence: F52/70 is a classical virulent strain (vIBDV), whereas UK661 is a very virulent strain (vvIBDV) that causes greater pathology and earlier mortality. The exact causes of clinical disease and death are still unclear. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-6, produced by activated macrophages, could play a role, as could cytokines produced by T and natural killer (NK) cells, such as interferon (IFN)-gamma, which stimulate macrophages. We quantified mRNA transcription in bursal tissue, by real-time quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), for the type I IFN (IFN-alpha and IFN-beta), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, and CXCLi2), the anti-inflammatory cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta4, and Th1 cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-2 [and the closely related IL-15], IL-12, and IL-18) for the first 5 days after infection of 3-week-old chickens with F52/70 or UK661 and compared these with levels in bursal tissue from uninfected age-matched controls. Both strains induced a pro-inflammatory response, evidenced by increased mRNA transcription of IL-1beta, IL-6, and CXCLi2, and down-regulation of TGF-beta4, of similar magnitude and timing. IFN-gamma mRNA was induced by both strains, although to a greater degree by the vvIBDV strain, indicating that a cell-mediated response is induced. Neither virus initially induced high levels of type I IFN. F52/70 seems to use a "stealth" approach by not inducing the type I IFNs, whereas UK661 down-regulates their expression. This suggests that both viruses modulate the host immune response, although probably by using different mechanisms.
关于传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)发病机制中涉及的免疫反应,人们了解甚少。IBDV毒株的毒力各不相同:F52/70是一种经典的强毒株(vIBDV),而UK661是一种超强毒株(vvIBDV),会导致更严重的病变和更早的死亡。临床疾病和死亡的确切原因仍不清楚。由活化巨噬细胞产生的促炎细胞因子,如白细胞介素(IL)-1β和IL-6,可能发挥作用,T细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞产生的细胞因子,如刺激巨噬细胞的干扰素(IFN)-γ,也可能发挥作用。我们通过实时定量逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对3周龄鸡感染F52/70或UK661后前5天法氏囊组织中I型干扰素(IFN-α和IFN-β)、促炎细胞因子(IL-1β、IL-6和CXCLi2)、抗炎细胞因子转化生长因子(TGF)-β4和Th1细胞因子(IFN-γ、IL-2[以及密切相关的IL-15]、IL-12和IL-18)的mRNA转录进行了定量,并将这些结果与未感染的年龄匹配对照的法氏囊组织中的水平进行了比较。两种毒株均诱导了促炎反应,表现为IL-1β、IL-6和CXCLi2的mRNA转录增加以及TGF-β4的下调,其程度和时间相似。两种毒株均诱导了IFN-γ mRNA,尽管vvIBDV毒株诱导的程度更大,这表明诱导了细胞介导的反应。两种病毒最初均未诱导高水平的I型干扰素。F52/70似乎采用“隐身”策略,不诱导I型干扰素,而UK661则下调其表达。这表明两种病毒均调节宿主免疫反应,尽管可能通过不同机制。