Departments of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Clinical Laboratories, National Jewish Hospital and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80206.
Infect Immun. 1971 Apr;3(4):524-9. doi: 10.1128/iai.3.4.524-529.1971.
The antigenicities of Mycobacterium bovis strain BCG and an isoniazid (INH) - resistant mutant were compared. Sonic extracts of heat-killed, washed bacteria were injected into rabbits, and antisera were produced (anti-BCG and anti-BCG-R). The sonic extracts were also subjected to ultracentrifugation, and test antigens were prepared from the resulting supernatants (BCG and BCG-R). The antigens were labeled with (131)I, and the antisera were tested for their capacity to bind (131)I-BCG and (131)I-BCG-R by precipitating (131)I-antigen-antibody complexes with anti-rabbit gamma globulin. Significant differences were detected between the two test antigens. Immunodiffusion studies with unabsorbed antisera and antisera absorbed with BCG and BCG-R suggested that an antigenic component in BCG is lacking or diminished in BCG-R and that anti-BCG has antibodies not found in anti-BCG-R. These quantitative and qualitative differences were confirmed by inhibition studies. Complete inhibition was achieved in all systems by both test antigens when either was added in sufficient concentration. As expected, BCG-R inhibited the binding of (131)I-BCG-R by anti-BCG-R or anti-BCG (or both) to a greater extent than BCG, and BCG was a better inhibitor in an (131)I-BCG-anti-BCG-R system. However, in an (131)I-BCG-anti-BCG test system, BCG was the better inhibitor only at high concentrations. It was concluded that the test antigens possess different proportions of identical or cross-reacting components and that INH-sensitive organisms possess a component(s) that is diminished or absent in the INH-resistant mutant. Whether this component(s) is responsible for INH-resistance is not known.
牛型结核分枝杆菌菌株 BCG 和异烟肼(INH)抗性突变体的抗原性进行了比较。将加热杀死、洗涤过的细菌的超声提取物注入兔子体内,产生了抗血清(抗-BCG 和抗-BCG-R)。超声提取物也进行了超速离心,从得到的上清液中制备测试抗原(BCG 和 BCG-R)。抗原用(131)I 标记,并用抗兔γ球蛋白沉淀(131)I-抗原-抗体复合物来测试抗血清与(131)I-BCG 和(131)I-BCG-R 的结合能力。在两种测试抗原之间检测到显著差异。未吸收的抗血清和用 BCG 和 BCG-R 吸收的抗血清的免疫扩散研究表明,BCG 中的一种抗原成分在 BCG-R 中缺失或减少,而抗-BCG 具有抗-BCG-R 中未发现的抗体。这些定量和定性差异通过抑制研究得到证实。当以足够的浓度添加任何一种测试抗原时,所有系统都完全抑制。正如预期的那样,BCG-R 以比 BCG 更高的程度抑制(131)I-BCG-R 与抗-BCG-R 或抗-BCG(或两者)的结合,而在(131)I-BCG-抗-BCG-R 系统中,BCG 是更好的抑制剂。然而,在(131)I-BCG-抗-BCG 测试系统中,BCG 仅在高浓度时才是更好的抑制剂。结论是,测试抗原具有不同比例的相同或交叉反应成分,而 INH 敏感的生物体具有在 INH 抗性突变体中减少或缺失的成分(s)。该成分(s)是否与 INH 抗性有关尚不清楚。