The Center for Vaccine Development, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Infect Immun. 1980 Feb;27(2):497-500. doi: 10.1128/iai.27.2.497-500.1980.
Serum samples were obtained from 92 informed, community volunteers before and 10, 21, and 28 days after they ingested 10(3) to 10(6)Vibrio cholerae of Inaba or Ogawa serotype and classical or El Tor biotype as part of a cholera vaccine development program. Pre- and postchallenge sera were examined for neutralizing antibody to cholera toxin by the rabbit skin permeability factor and adrenal cell techniques. Immunoglobulin G-binding antibodies to cholera toxin were quantitated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serum diluted 1:200. The results obtained in these cholera volunteers were compared with a negative control population comprising 30 people who ingested enteropathogenic Escherichia coli or E. coli which produced heat-stable but not heat-labile enterotoxin. Although all three antitoxin assays correlated closely with each other in both groups of volunteers, ELISA was more sensitive than either neutralization assay in detecting both subclinical and overt cholera infections. Seroconversion was demonstrated by ELISA in 58 of 66 (88%) volunteers who excreted V. cholerae, including 50 of 54 (93%) with clinical cholera, compared with 47 of 66 (71%) and 52 of 66 (79%) by the rabbit skin permeability factor and adrenal cell techniques, respectively. Although ELISA does not measure the toxin-neutralizing activity of antibodies directly, it provides a practical alternative to the rabbit skin permeability factor and adrenal cell assays.
在一项霍乱疫苗开发项目中,92 名知情的社区志愿者在摄入 10(3)至 10(6)型侵袭性霍乱弧菌(血清型为 Inaba 或 Ogawa,生物型为古典或 El Tor)前后 10、21 和 28 天采集血清样本。用兔皮肤通透性因子和肾上腺细胞技术检测血清中和霍乱毒素的中和抗体。用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清中与霍乱毒素结合的 IgG 抗体,血清稀释度为 1:200。将这些霍乱志愿者的结果与包含 30 人的阴性对照人群进行比较,这些人摄入产肠致病性大肠杆菌或产生不耐热肠毒素但不产生耐热肠毒素的大肠杆菌。尽管在两组志愿者中,三种抗毒素检测均密切相关,但 ELISA 比中和检测更能检测到亚临床和显性霍乱感染。在 66 名排出霍乱弧菌的志愿者中,58 名(88%)通过 ELISA 显示血清转化,包括 54 名(93%)有临床霍乱,而兔皮肤通透性因子和肾上腺细胞技术分别为 47 名(71%)和 52 名(79%)。虽然 ELISA 不能直接测量抗体的中和毒素活性,但它为兔皮肤通透性因子和肾上腺细胞检测提供了一种实用的替代方法。