Thomas G. Weidner is Assistant Professor of Athletic Training at Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306.
J Athl Train. 1994 Mar;29(1):67-9.
Continuing education for certified athletic trainers is both required and essential. The purpose of this study was to determine the need, including solutions and priorities, for continuing education for athletic trainers in various employment settings. Focus group sessions were conducted during the Spring 1992 District 4 meeting of the National Athletic Trainers Association. Representatives for each of the following employment settings were selected from the preregistration list and invited to participate: high school (7 participated), college/university (8), corporate/industrial (6), professional (3), and clinical (8). Data were compiled from written lists and audio cassette recordings of group discussions. Focus group participants across all employment settings felt that their primary continuing education needs were not being addressed at district meetings. Less traditional topics (eg, ergonomics, budgeting, public relations, and functional capacity evaluations) were identified as the more essential education needs. Focus group opinions varied somewhat regarding specific topics and methods of presentation. Recommendations included a more thematic approach to topics and presentations and ample opportunities for work or discussions in small groups. Results of the focus groups could impact the professional preparation of athletic trainers.
继续教育对于认证的运动训练师来说是必需且重要的。本研究旨在确定不同就业环境下运动训练师继续教育的需求,包括解决方案和优先事项。该研究在 1992 年春季第 4 区全国运动训练师协会会议期间进行了焦点小组会议。从预先登记的名单中选择了以下每个就业环境的代表,并邀请他们参加:高中(7 人参加)、学院/大学(8 人)、企业/工业(6 人)、专业(3 人)和临床(8 人)。数据是从小组讨论的书面清单和音频盒式录音中汇编的。所有就业环境的焦点小组参与者都认为他们的主要继续教育需求在地区会议上没有得到满足。非传统主题(例如,人体工程学、预算、公共关系和功能能力评估)被确定为更必要的教育需求。关于具体主题和演示方法,焦点小组的意见略有不同。建议包括更主题的方法来处理主题和演示,以及为小组工作或讨论提供充足的机会。焦点小组的结果可能会影响运动训练师的专业准备。