• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。

Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.

作者信息

Basch C E

机构信息

Department of Health Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.

出版信息

Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.

DOI:10.1177/109019818701400404
PMID:3319971
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to increase awareness about and stimulate interest in using focus group interviews, a qualitative research technique, to advance the state-of-the-art of education and learning about health. After a brief discussion of small group process in health education, features of focus group interviews are presented, and a theoretical framework for planning a focus group study is summarized. Then, literature describing traditional and health-related applications of focus group interviews is reviewed and a synthesis of methodological limitations and advantages of this technique is presented. Implications are discussed regarding: need for more inductive qualitative research in health education; utility of focus group interviews for research and for formative and summative evaluation of health education programs; applicability of marketing research to understanding and influencing consumer behavior, despite notable distinctions between educational initiatives and marketing; and need for professional preparation faculty to consider increasing emphasis on qualitative research methods.

摘要

本文的目的是提高对焦点小组访谈(一种定性研究技术)的认识,并激发对其的兴趣,以推动健康教育与学习领域的技术发展。在简要讨论健康教育中的小组过程之后,介绍了焦点小组访谈的特点,并总结了规划焦点小组研究的理论框架。然后,回顾了描述焦点小组访谈在传统领域和与健康相关领域应用的文献,并对该技术的方法局限性和优势进行了综合阐述。还讨论了以下几方面的影响:健康教育中对更多归纳性定性研究的需求;焦点小组访谈在健康教育项目研究、形成性评价和总结性评价中的效用;尽管教育举措与营销存在显著差异,但市场研究在理解和影响消费者行为方面的适用性;以及专业预备教师需要考虑更加强调定性研究方法。

相似文献

1
Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。
Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.
2
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
3
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
4
Focus group interviews in health-care research.医疗保健研究中的焦点小组访谈。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Mar;14(6):395-7.
5
Focus group: implications for program evaluation of mental health services.焦点小组:对心理健康服务项目评估的启示
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):148-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02518609.
6
An introduction and application of focus group research to the health care industry.焦点小组研究在医疗保健行业的介绍与应用。
Health Mark Q. 1984;2(2-3):199-209. doi: 10.1300/j026v02n02_19.
7
Focus group interview: a research technique for informed nursing practice.焦点小组访谈:一种用于明智护理实践的研究技术。
J Adv Nurs. 1990 Nov;15(11):1281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01743.x.
8
Assessing beliefs of older rural Americans about nutrition education: use of the focus group approach.评估美国农村老年人对营养教育的看法:焦点小组方法的应用。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Apr;90(4):563-7.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Goals in Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Care Partner Perspectives.三尖瓣反流患者报告的目标:对患者及护理伙伴观点的定性分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 10;4(8):101982. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101982.
2
Qualitative Analysis of Views of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in Low-Income, Urban, Black Americans.低收入城市美国黑人对迷幻辅助疗法看法的定性分析
Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2025 May 26;3(2):103-112. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2024.0015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Exploring influencing factors and facilitating strategies for self-directed learning from the perspective of medical trainees: a multicentre qualitative study in China.
从医学实习生的角度探索自主学习的影响因素及促进策略:一项中国的多中心定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 20;15(2):e088688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088688.
4
Overcoming barriers and enabling artificial intelligence adoption in allied health clinical practice: A qualitative study.克服障碍并推动人工智能在联合健康临床实践中的应用:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 3;11:20552076241311144. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311144. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Analysis of the intensity of engagement with , a text message intervention for dementia caregiver support among Latinos/as.分析与拉丁裔/美籍痴呆症照顾者支持的短信干预措施 的参与强度。
Ethn Health. 2024 Nov;29(8):924-945. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2387111. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
6
Exploring mHealth design opportunities for blind and visually impaired older users.探索面向失明及视力受损老年用户的移动健康设计机会。
Mhealth. 2024 Apr 3;10:17. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-23-65. eCollection 2024.
7
Medical student´s motivational changes during the COVID-19 university lockdown: a mixed-method study.医学生在 COVID-19 大学封锁期间的动机变化:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05204-9.
8
Research collaboration with older people as a matter of scientific quality and ethics: a focus group study with researchers in ageing and health.作为科学质量和伦理问题的与老年人的研究合作:一项针对老年与健康领域研究人员的焦点小组研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 10;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00540-y.
9
National consensus on entrustable professional activities for competency-based training in anaesthesiology.基于胜任力的麻醉学专业培训的可委托专业活动的国家共识。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 11;18(7):e0288197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288197. eCollection 2023.
10
A Qualitative Study of Decision-making (DM) in Surgery and Cancer Care: an Indian Perspective.一项关于外科手术和癌症护理中决策制定的定性研究:印度视角
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;14(2):458-465. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01521-x. Epub 2022 Apr 4.