Suppr超能文献

学生和导师对运动训练教育中监督质量的看法。

Student and supervisor perceptions of the quality of supervision in athletic training education.

机构信息

Mark B. Andersen is Senior Lecturer at Department of Human Movement, Recreation, and Performance, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 1997 Oct;32(4):328-32.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the perceptions of the quality of athletic training supervision via the internship route to certification and the NATA-approved/CAAHEP programs.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A questionnaire was mailed to head athletic trainers or NATA/CAAHEP program directors and athletic training students in 40 programs nationwide (stratified random sample).

SUBJECTS

Head athletic trainers (20), NATA-approved or CAAHEP-accredited program directors (20), and athletic training students in those educational programs (149).

MEASUREMENTS

The Athletic Training Supervisory Skills Inventory (ATSSI) was adapted from the Supervisory Evaluation Form (SEF) and athletic training literature. The ATSSI was reviewed by 30 certified athletic trainers, and their feedback was incorporated into the final version of the questionnaire. The ATSSI contains 46 questions that cover six major domains of athletic training supervisor behavior.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no differences in how internship route supervisors and NATA/CAAHEP program directors rated their own supervisory skills. Also, there were few differences in how students in those two types of athletic training education programs rated their supervisors.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study's limitations included a one-time assessment approach and a small sample of supervisors. Future studies in supervision should take a longitudinal approach and include a larger sample size.

摘要

目的

评估通过实习途径获得认证的以及 NATA 认可/CAAHEP 项目的运动训练监督质量的认知。

设计和设置

向全国 40 个项目的运动训练主管或 NATA/CAAHEP 项目主管和运动训练学生邮寄了一份问卷(分层随机抽样)。

研究对象

运动训练主管(20 名)、NATA 认可或 CAAHEP 认可项目主管(20 名)和这些教育项目中的运动训练学生(149 名)。

测量方法

运动训练监督技能量表(ATSSI)改编自监督评估表(SEF)和运动训练文献。该 ATSSI 由 30 名认证运动训练师进行了审查,并将他们的反馈意见纳入了问卷的最终版本。ATSSI 包含 46 个问题,涵盖运动训练主管行为的六个主要领域。

结果

总体而言,实习途径主管和 NATA/CAAHEP 项目主管对自己的监督技能的评价没有差异。此外,这两种类型的运动训练教育项目的学生对他们的主管的评价也没有太大差异。

结论

这项探索性研究的局限性包括一次性评估方法和主管的小样本。未来的监督研究应采用纵向方法,并包括更大的样本量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验