• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对本科运动训练专业学生学习风格的评估。

An assessment of learning styles among undergraduate athletic training students.

机构信息

DCH Regional Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL 35476.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 1998 Jan;33(1):50-3.

PMID:16558485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1320376/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Increased attention has been directed toward assessing and improving academic quality in athletic training education. The educational process has been assessed from a global level, but little is known about how athletic training students learn. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the learning styles of undergraduate athletic training students.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Undergraduate students enrolled in a Committee on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP)-accredited athletic training education program completed a learning styles inventory during a regularly scheduled athletic training class at the start of the spring semester.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-seven student athletic trainers (age range, 19-30 yrs, mean age = 20.5 yrs) served as subjects. Sixteen subjects (7 male, 9 female) were in the first year of this 3-year program. Eleven subjects (7 male, 4 female) were second-year students.

MEASUREMENTS

Learning style was assessed using the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey.

RESULTS

Parametric and nonparametric one-way analyses of variance for each learning subscale by sex and by year in program revealed significant differences (P < .05) in light preferences for male and female students. There were also significant differences (P < .05) between first-and second-year students in preferences for afternoon learning activities.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that undergraduate athletic training students function best as leamers in a well-lit leaming environment. The significance of aftemoon as the preferred time for learning reinforces the importance of the clinical setting in the introduction and mastery of skills. Athletic training educators and clinical instructors can use these results as they examine their teaching strategies and educational environments.

摘要

目的

人们越来越关注评估和提高运动训练教育的学术质量。人们已经从全球层面评估了教育过程,但对于运动训练学生如何学习知之甚少。本研究旨在评估运动训练本科生的学习风格。

设计与设置

在春季学期的正常运动训练课程开始时,参加认证的运动训练教育项目(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练教育计划的本科生完成了学习风格清单。

受试者

27 名学生运动员培训师(年龄范围为 19-30 岁,平均年龄为 20.5 岁)担任受试者。16 名受试者(7 名男性,9 名女性)在这个 3 年制课程的第一年。11 名受试者(7 名男性,4 名女性)是第二年的学生。

测量

使用生产力环境偏好调查评估学习风格。

结果

按性别和按项目年限对每个学习子量表进行的参数和非参数单因素方差分析显示,男性和女性学生对光的偏好存在显着差异(P <.05)。第一年级和第二年级学生对下午学习活动的偏好也存在显着差异(P <.05)。

结论

这些发现表明,运动训练本科生在光线充足的学习环境中作为学习者表现最佳。下午作为首选学习时间的重要性强调了临床环境在技能引入和掌握中的重要性。运动训练教育者和临床讲师可以在检查他们的教学策略和教育环境时使用这些结果。

相似文献

1
An assessment of learning styles among undergraduate athletic training students.对本科运动训练专业学生学习风格的评估。
J Athl Train. 1998 Jan;33(1):50-3.
2
Preferred teaching and testing methods of athletic training students and program directors and the relationship to styles.运动训练专业学生和项目主任偏爱的教学与测试方法及其与风格的关系。
J Allied Health. 2006 Spring;35(1):43-9.
3
Consistency of Learning Styles of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students in the Traditional Classroom versus the Clinical Setting.本科运动训练学生在传统课堂与临床环境中的学习风格的一致性。
J Athl Train. 2000 Oct;35(4):441-4.
4
A Nationwide Learning-Style Assessment of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students in CAAHEP-Accredited Athletic Training Programs.对美国高等院校健康与体育教育认证委员会(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练专业本科学生的全国性学习风格评估。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S141-S146.
5
Pedagogic Strategies Perceived to Enhance Student Learning in Athletic Training Education.被认为能提高运动训练教育中学生学习效果的教学策略。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S199-S207.
6
Job search and employment-related issues in athletic training education programs.运动训练教育项目中的求职和就业相关问题。
J Athl Train. 1999 Oct;34(4):368-74.
7
Student and supervisor perceptions of the quality of supervision in athletic training education.学生和导师对运动训练教育中监督质量的看法。
J Athl Train. 1997 Oct;32(4):328-32.
8
Pre-athletic training students perform better on written tests with teacher-centered instruction.进行运动前训练的学生在以教师为中心的书面测试中表现更好。
J Allied Health. 2004 Fall;33(3):200-4.
9
Critical-Thinking Predisposition Among Undergraduate Athletic Training Students.本科运动训练专业学生的批判性思维倾向
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S147-S151.
10
Effects of Clinical Field-Experience Setting on Athletic Training Students' Perceived Percentage of Time Spent on Active Learning.临床实习环境对运动训练专业学生主动学习时间占比认知的影响。
J Athl Train. 2004 Jun;39(2):176-184.

引用本文的文献

1
Current knowledge, attitudes, and practices of certified athletic trainers regarding recognition and treatment of exertional heat stroke.认证运动训练师对运动性热射病的认识和治疗的现有知识、态度和实践。
J Athl Train. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):170-80. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.2.170.
2
Stylistic learning differences between undergraduate athletic training students and educators: Gregorc mind styles.本科运动训练专业学生与教育工作者之间的学习风格差异:格雷戈尔思维风格
J Athl Train. 2006 Jan-Mar;41(1):109-16.
3
Effects of Clinical Field-Experience Setting on Athletic Training Students' Perceived Percentage of Time Spent on Active Learning.临床实习环境对运动训练专业学生主动学习时间占比认知的影响。
J Athl Train. 2004 Jun;39(2):176-184.
4
Clinical-Education-Setting Standards Are Helpful in the Professional Preparation of Employed, Entry-Level Certified Athletic Trainers.临床教育环境标准有助于在职入门级认证运动训练师的专业培养。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S248-S254.
5
Pedagogic Strategies Perceived to Enhance Student Learning in Athletic Training Education.被认为能提高运动训练教育中学生学习效果的教学策略。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S199-S207.
6
Overview of Athletic Training Education Research Publications.运动训练教育研究出版物综述
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S162-S167.
7
A Nationwide Learning-Style Assessment of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students in CAAHEP-Accredited Athletic Training Programs.对美国高等院校健康与体育教育认证委员会(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练专业本科学生的全国性学习风格评估。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S141-S146.
8
An Investigation of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students' Learning Styles and Program Admission Success.本科运动训练专业学生学习风格与项目录取成功率的调查
J Athl Train. 2001 Jun;36(2):130-135.

本文引用的文献

1
Accommodating nursing students' diverse learning styles.适应护理专业学生多样的学习风格。
Nurse Educ. 1994 Nov-Dec;19(6):41-5. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199411000-00018.
2
Reliability and construct validity of alternate forms of the CLS Inventory.CLS 量表替代形式的信度与结构效度。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1984 Oct;7(1):78-85. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198410000-00009.
3
Cognitive styles and learning styles as predictors of academic success in a graduate allied health education program.认知风格和学习风格作为研究生联合健康专业教育项目中学术成就的预测因素
J Allied Health. 1985 Feb;14(1):89-98.
4
Relationship between occupational therapy student learning styles and clinic performance.职业治疗专业学生的学习风格与临床实践表现之间的关系。
Am J Occup Ther. 1986 Jan;40(1):34-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.40.1.34.
5
A four-year longitudinal study of dental student learning styles.一项针对牙科学生学习风格的四年纵向研究。
J Dent Educ. 1987 Apr;51(4):175-81.
6
Assessing learning styles using a computerized learning style inventory.使用计算机化学习风格量表评估学习风格。
Comput Nurs. 1991 May-Jun;9(3):121-5.
7
A study of two "quick-and-easy" methods of assessing individual differences in student learning.一项关于评估学生学习中个体差异的两种“快速简便”方法的研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1992 Nov;62 ( Pt 3):299-312. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01024.x.