DCH Regional Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL 35476.
J Athl Train. 1998 Jan;33(1):50-3.
Increased attention has been directed toward assessing and improving academic quality in athletic training education. The educational process has been assessed from a global level, but little is known about how athletic training students learn. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the learning styles of undergraduate athletic training students.
Undergraduate students enrolled in a Committee on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP)-accredited athletic training education program completed a learning styles inventory during a regularly scheduled athletic training class at the start of the spring semester.
Twenty-seven student athletic trainers (age range, 19-30 yrs, mean age = 20.5 yrs) served as subjects. Sixteen subjects (7 male, 9 female) were in the first year of this 3-year program. Eleven subjects (7 male, 4 female) were second-year students.
Learning style was assessed using the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey.
Parametric and nonparametric one-way analyses of variance for each learning subscale by sex and by year in program revealed significant differences (P < .05) in light preferences for male and female students. There were also significant differences (P < .05) between first-and second-year students in preferences for afternoon learning activities.
These findings suggest that undergraduate athletic training students function best as leamers in a well-lit leaming environment. The significance of aftemoon as the preferred time for learning reinforces the importance of the clinical setting in the introduction and mastery of skills. Athletic training educators and clinical instructors can use these results as they examine their teaching strategies and educational environments.
人们越来越关注评估和提高运动训练教育的学术质量。人们已经从全球层面评估了教育过程,但对于运动训练学生如何学习知之甚少。本研究旨在评估运动训练本科生的学习风格。
在春季学期的正常运动训练课程开始时,参加认证的运动训练教育项目(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练教育计划的本科生完成了学习风格清单。
27 名学生运动员培训师(年龄范围为 19-30 岁,平均年龄为 20.5 岁)担任受试者。16 名受试者(7 名男性,9 名女性)在这个 3 年制课程的第一年。11 名受试者(7 名男性,4 名女性)是第二年的学生。
使用生产力环境偏好调查评估学习风格。
按性别和按项目年限对每个学习子量表进行的参数和非参数单因素方差分析显示,男性和女性学生对光的偏好存在显着差异(P <.05)。第一年级和第二年级学生对下午学习活动的偏好也存在显着差异(P <.05)。
这些发现表明,运动训练本科生在光线充足的学习环境中作为学习者表现最佳。下午作为首选学习时间的重要性强调了临床环境在技能引入和掌握中的重要性。运动训练教育者和临床讲师可以在检查他们的教学策略和教育环境时使用这些结果。