• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预处理因素显著影响癌症患者的生活质量:放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)分析。

Pretreatment factors significantly influence quality of life in cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis.

作者信息

Movsas Benjamin, Scott Charles, Watkins-Bruner Deborah

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.004
PMID:16564646
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of pretreatment factors on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pretreatment QOL (via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT], version 2) was obtained in 1,428 patients in several prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials including nonmetastatic head-and-neck (n = 1139), esophageal (n = 174), lung (n = 51), rectal (n = 47), and prostate (n = 17) cancer patients. Clinically meaningful differences between groups were defined as a difference of 1 standard error of measurement (SEM).

RESULTS

The mean FACT score for all patients was 86 (20.7-112) with SEM of 5.3. Statistically significant differences in QOL were observed based on age, race, Karnofsky Performance Status, marital status, education level, income level, and employment status, but not by gender or primary site. Using the SEM, there were clinically meaningful differences between patients </=50 years vs. >/=65 years. Hispanics had worse QOL than whites. FACT increased linearly with higher Karnofsky Performance Status and income levels. Married patients (or live-in relationships) had a better QOL than single, divorced, or widowed patients. College graduates had better QOL than those with less education.

CONCLUSION

Most pretreatment factors meaningfully influenced baseline QOL. The potentially devastating impact of a cancer diagnosis, particularly in young and minority patients, must be addressed.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在评估预处理因素对癌症患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。

方法和材料

在多项前瞻性放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)试验中,对1428例患者进行了预处理QOL评估(通过癌症治疗功能评估[FACT]第2版),这些患者包括非转移性头颈癌(n = 1139)、食管癌(n = 174)、肺癌(n = 51)、直肠癌(n = 47)和前列腺癌(n = 17)患者。组间具有临床意义的差异定义为测量标准误(SEM)的1个差异。

结果

所有患者的平均FACT评分为86(20.7 - 112),SEM为5.3。根据年龄、种族、卡诺夫斯基表现状态、婚姻状况、教育水平、收入水平和就业状况观察到生活质量存在统计学显著差异,但性别或原发部位无差异。使用SEM,50岁及以下患者与65岁及以上患者之间存在临床意义的差异。西班牙裔患者的生活质量比白人差。FACT随着卡诺夫斯基表现状态和收入水平的提高呈线性增加。已婚患者(或同居关系)的生活质量比单身、离婚或丧偶患者好。大学毕业生的生活质量比受教育程度较低者好。

结论

大多数预处理因素对基线生活质量有显著影响。必须解决癌症诊断可能带来的毁灭性影响,特别是对年轻和少数族裔患者。

相似文献

1
Pretreatment factors significantly influence quality of life in cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis.预处理因素显著影响癌症患者的生活质量:放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
2
Gender differences in pretreatment quality of life in a prospective lung cancer trial.一项前瞻性肺癌试验中治疗前生活质量的性别差异。
J Support Oncol. 2008 Jan;6(1):33-9.
3
Pretreatment quality of life predicts for locoregional control in head and neck cancer patients: a radiation therapy oncology group analysis.治疗前生活质量可预测头颈癌患者的局部区域控制:一项放射肿瘤学组分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Feb 1;70(2):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.024. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
4
Effect of education level on outcome of patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 90-03.教育水平对接受放射治疗肿瘤学组90-03方案治疗患者结局的影响。
Cancer. 2003 Oct 1;98(7):1497-503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11661.
5
Impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on quality of life after primary radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌患者接受初次放疗后,放射性口干对口生活质量的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):751-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
6
Quality of life as a survival predictor for patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.生活质量作为接受放疗的晚期头颈癌患者生存的预测指标。
Cancer. 2004 Jan 15;100(2):425-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20010.
7
Clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes with amifostine in combination with chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of RTOG 9801.氨磷汀联合放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者报告结局的临床意义差异:RTOG 9801分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):1378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 22.
8
Quality-of-life measurement in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a Hong Kong experience.头颈部癌放疗患者的生活质量测量:香港的经验
J Oncol Manag. 2004 Nov-Dec;13(6):13-23.
9
Impact of late treatment-related toxicity on quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy.放疗治疗的头颈癌患者中,迟发性治疗相关毒性对生活质量的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3770-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6647.
10
Can serum markers be used to predict acute and late toxicity in patients with lung cancer? Analysis of RTOG 91-03.血清标志物能否用于预测肺癌患者的急性和晚期毒性?RTOG 91-03分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug;30(4):368-76. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000260950.44761.74.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced gynecological cancer: Quality of life one year after diagnosis.晚期妇科癌症:诊断一年后的生活质量。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287562. eCollection 2023.
2
Symptom Clusters in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model.头颈部癌症症状群:系统评价与概念模型。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;37(5):151215. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151215. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3
The Effect of Thoracic Radiotherapy on the Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients.胸部放疗对肺癌患者生活质量的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Mar 13;13(3):e13870. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13870.
4
Prospective assessment of demographic characteristics associated with worse health related quality of life measures following definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者进行根治性放化疗后,与健康相关生活质量较差测量指标相关的人口统计学特征的前瞻性评估。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Aug;8(4):332-339. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.08.21.
5
To what extent is the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) associated with quality of life as measured using the EORTC C30 and CR38 quality of life questionnaires?低位前切除综合征(LARS)在多大程度上与生活质量相关,这可以通过使用 EORTC C30 和 CR38 生活质量问卷来衡量?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Apr;34(4):747-762. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03249-7. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Symptoms Experience and Quality of Life in The Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving The Taxane Class of Drugs.接受紫杉烷类药物治疗的乳腺癌患者的症状体验与生活质量
Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Jul 1;14(3):148-155. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3785. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Determinants and prognostic value of quality of life in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.胰腺导管腺癌患者生活质量的决定因素及其预后价值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Mar;92:20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
The "rocky treatment course": identifying a high-risk subgroup of head and neck cancer patients for supportive interventions.“坎坷的治疗过程”:识别头颈癌患者中需要支持性干预的高危亚组。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):719-727. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3450-5. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Quality of Life and Performance Status From a Substudy Conducted Within a Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0522.在一项关于同步加速放疗联合顺铂加或不加西妥昔单抗治疗局部晚期头颈癌的前瞻性3期随机试验中的子研究里的生活质量和性能状态:NRG肿瘤学放射治疗肿瘤学组0522
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 15;97(4):687-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
Depression as a predictor of postoperative functional performance status (PFPS) and treatment adherence in head and neck cancer patients: a prospective study.抑郁症作为头颈癌患者术后功能表现状态(PFPS)和治疗依从性的预测指标:一项前瞻性研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Sep 18;44(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0092-4.