Movsas Benjamin, Scott Charles, Watkins-Bruner Deborah
Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of pretreatment factors on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients.
Pretreatment QOL (via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT], version 2) was obtained in 1,428 patients in several prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials including nonmetastatic head-and-neck (n = 1139), esophageal (n = 174), lung (n = 51), rectal (n = 47), and prostate (n = 17) cancer patients. Clinically meaningful differences between groups were defined as a difference of 1 standard error of measurement (SEM).
The mean FACT score for all patients was 86 (20.7-112) with SEM of 5.3. Statistically significant differences in QOL were observed based on age, race, Karnofsky Performance Status, marital status, education level, income level, and employment status, but not by gender or primary site. Using the SEM, there were clinically meaningful differences between patients </=50 years vs. >/=65 years. Hispanics had worse QOL than whites. FACT increased linearly with higher Karnofsky Performance Status and income levels. Married patients (or live-in relationships) had a better QOL than single, divorced, or widowed patients. College graduates had better QOL than those with less education.
Most pretreatment factors meaningfully influenced baseline QOL. The potentially devastating impact of a cancer diagnosis, particularly in young and minority patients, must be addressed.
本分析旨在评估预处理因素对癌症患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。
在多项前瞻性放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)试验中,对1428例患者进行了预处理QOL评估(通过癌症治疗功能评估[FACT]第2版),这些患者包括非转移性头颈癌(n = 1139)、食管癌(n = 174)、肺癌(n = 51)、直肠癌(n = 47)和前列腺癌(n = 17)患者。组间具有临床意义的差异定义为测量标准误(SEM)的1个差异。
所有患者的平均FACT评分为86(20.7 - 112),SEM为5.3。根据年龄、种族、卡诺夫斯基表现状态、婚姻状况、教育水平、收入水平和就业状况观察到生活质量存在统计学显著差异,但性别或原发部位无差异。使用SEM,50岁及以下患者与65岁及以上患者之间存在临床意义的差异。西班牙裔患者的生活质量比白人差。FACT随着卡诺夫斯基表现状态和收入水平的提高呈线性增加。已婚患者(或同居关系)的生活质量比单身、离婚或丧偶患者好。大学毕业生的生活质量比受教育程度较低者好。
大多数预处理因素对基线生活质量有显著影响。必须解决癌症诊断可能带来的毁灭性影响,特别是对年轻和少数族裔患者。