Clinical performance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns with and without fiber reinforcement: one-year results of a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior, metal-free polymer crowns with and without a glass-fiber framework, in comparison to metal-ceramic crowns.

METHODS

After randomisation, 80 single crowns, manufactured from a newly designed polymer composite, were set in posterior teeth. Half of these received a glass-fiber framework, while half were prepared without any framework stabilisation. All polymer crowns were adhesively luted with resin cement. As the control group, 40 conventional metal-ceramic crowns were inserted with hybrid cement. Documentation included failures and other complications, as well as gingival/plaque status and aesthetic performance.

RESULTS

During the 12-month observation period, eight polymer crowns and three metal-ceramic crowns showed clinically relevant complications. The most frequent complications were root canal treatments (n=4) and decementation (n=4) of the crowns. A total of two crowns (one polymer crown with fiber network and one crown of the control group) had to be replaced. After 12 months, polymer crowns with glass-fiber framework exhibited significantly higher plaque accumulation (p=0.005) and gingival index (p=0.04) than metal-ceramic crowns, while no significant differences could be demonstrated for polymer crowns without fiber reinforcement. Postoperative sensibility and aesthetic performance did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a 12-month observation period, posterior polymer crowns with and without glass-fiber framework demonstrated acceptable stability and aesthetic performance. Polymer crowns with fiber framework showed significant higher plaque accumulation and gingival index than metal-ceramic crowns.