Laza-Achille Mihaela, Desruennes Eric, Di Palma Mario
Département de médecine adulte, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille-Desmoulin, 94800 Villejuif.
Bull Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;93(3):271-81.
The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in association with malignancy, and has a potential to produce significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment of such patients with anticoagulants is associated with both benefit and a high rate of complications. In the early phase, the treatment is usually achieved with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which has a number of advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH): once or twice daily administration, no necessary laboratory monitoring, lesser risk of bleeding and no drugs interactions. Nevertheless, the UFH is the anticoagulant of choice when a rapid anticoagulant effect or stop of anticoagulant effect is required, in the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism or severe renal insufficiency. Prolonged anticoagulation with LMWH (over 3 or 6 months) appears to be beneficial on survival for such patients. The subject of anticoagulation in patients with primary or secondary brain tumours is controversial. The long-term anticoagulation mainly use LMWH or vitamin K antagonist. The last ones are more difficult to use because of an unpredictable response with higher rate of recurrence and bleeding. The optimal duration of treatment is not known but the patients should be treated for at least 6 months, even at least 12 months after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. On the primary prevention in high-risk surgical oncology, the LMWH are at least as effective and safer as UFH when the optimal dose was administered. For the medical patients, the use of prophylactic anticoagulant treatment is less clear except the patients who are bedridden for prolonged periods of time. For the secondary prevention, the LMWH seems to be more effective over vitamin K antagonists. For these patients, the anticoagulant therapy is recommended indefinitely or until cancer is resolved.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险在与恶性肿瘤相关时会增加,并且有可能导致严重的发病和死亡。用抗凝剂治疗此类患者既有益处,也有较高的并发症发生率。在早期阶段,通常使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)进行治疗,与普通肝素(UFH)相比,LMWH具有许多优势:每日给药一次或两次,无需实验室监测,出血风险较低且无药物相互作用。然而,在治疗大面积肺栓塞或严重肾功能不全时,需要快速产生抗凝效果或停止抗凝作用时,UFH是首选的抗凝剂。对这类患者长期使用LMWH(超过3或6个月)似乎对生存有益。原发性或继发性脑肿瘤患者的抗凝治疗存在争议。长期抗凝主要使用LMWH或维生素K拮抗剂。后者更难使用,因为其反应不可预测,复发率和出血率较高。最佳治疗持续时间尚不清楚,但患者应至少接受6个月的治疗,在发生第二次静脉血栓栓塞事件后甚至应至少治疗12个月。在高危肿瘤外科手术的一级预防中,当给予最佳剂量时,LMWH至少与UFH一样有效且更安全。对于内科患者,除了长期卧床的患者外,预防性抗凝治疗的使用情况不太明确。对于二级预防,LMWH似乎比维生素K拮抗剂更有效。对于这些患者,建议无限期进行抗凝治疗或直至癌症治愈。