Holzheimer René G
University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Apr 30;9(4):225-39.
Thromboembolic complications are a common and costly medical problem, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in postoperative patients. There have been reports of death due to thromboembolic complications even after short procedures, e.g. arthroscopy. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) (e.g., certoparin, dalteparin, enoxaparin, nadroparin, reviparin, tinzaparin) have been tested for treatment of deep vein thrombosis in comparison to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in many patients being effective and safe alternative for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Fixed-dose subcutaneous LMWH once daily is in most cases of equivalent efficacy and safety compared to conventional UFH therapy. There may be less risk for bleeding, less platelet activation together with a control of markers of haemostatic system activation, and either no progression or regression of thrombus size in patients treated with LMWH. The handling of LMWH is more comfortable for patients and less time consuming for nurses and laboratories compared to UFH. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that LMWH are more cost effective than UFH. It has been calculated that outpatient treatment with LMWH may save 1641 dollars per patient in comparison to hospital treatment. This economic benefit of outpatient treatment of DVT seems to be realized in different health systems. Women with antiphospholipid antibodies and a history of either prior thrombotic events or pregnancy loss are at high risk during pregnancy for either another fetal death or thrombosis and may benefit from treatment with LMWH. In patients with malignant tumors secondary prophylaxis or long-term treatment with LMWH is successful. Patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulants may benefit from treatment with LMWH as do patients on chronic anticoagulation treatment scheduled for an operative intervention. In most instances LMWH (dalteparin, enoxaparin, nadroparin) treatment for DVT may be given once daily at a fixed dose without any harm, based on a prolonged antithrombin activity. Effectiveness and safety of LMWH (dalteparin, enoxaparin, nadroparin, tinzaparin) in comparison to UFH treatment on outpatient basis has been demonstrated in several studies. In summary, LMWHs have an established role in the treatment of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE), on an in- and outpatient basis and could realize substantial savings. Most studies were performed with dalteparin, enoxaparin and nadroparin. There is evidence that LMWHs may help to prolong survival in cancer patients and to avoid complications of the acute coronary syndrome.
血栓栓塞并发症是一个常见且代价高昂的医学问题,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,尤其是在术后患者中。甚至在诸如关节镜检查等短手术之后,也有因血栓栓塞并发症导致死亡的报告。与普通肝素(UFH)相比,低分子量肝素(LMWHs)(如:克赛、达肝素、依诺肝素、那屈肝素、瑞肝素、替扎肝素)已被测试用于治疗深静脉血栓形成,在许多患者中是治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的有效且安全的替代药物。在大多数情况下,每日一次固定剂量皮下注射LMWH与传统UFH疗法具有同等的疗效和安全性。接受LMWH治疗的患者出血风险可能更低,血小板激活更少,同时止血系统激活标志物得到控制,血栓大小要么无进展要么缩小。与UFH相比,LMWH对患者来说使用更方便,对护士和实验室来说耗时更少。成本效益分析表明,LMWH比UFH更具成本效益。据计算,与住院治疗相比,门诊使用LMWH治疗每位患者可节省1641美元。DVT门诊治疗的这种经济效益似乎在不同的卫生系统中都能实现。有抗磷脂抗体且有既往血栓形成事件或流产史的女性在怀孕期间再次发生胎儿死亡或血栓形成的风险很高,可能从LMWH治疗中获益。在患有恶性肿瘤的患者中,LMWH用于二级预防或长期治疗是成功的。有口服抗凝剂禁忌证的患者以及计划进行手术干预的慢性抗凝治疗患者都可能从LMWH治疗中获益。在大多数情况下,基于抗凝血酶活性延长,LMWH(达肝素、依诺肝素、那屈肝素)治疗DVT可每日一次给予固定剂量而无任何危害。多项研究已证明LMWH(达肝素、依诺肝素、那屈肝素、替扎肝素)与UFH门诊治疗相比的有效性和安全性。总之,LMWH在DVT和肺栓塞(PE)的住院和门诊治疗中都发挥着既定作用,并且可以实现大量节省。大多数研究是使用达肝素、依诺肝素和那屈肝素进行的。有证据表明,LMWH可能有助于延长癌症患者的生存期并避免急性冠状动脉综合征的并发症。