• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男孩在一对一互动中更倾向于退缩,而女孩在群体中更倾向于退缩。

Boys withdraw more in one-on-one interactions, whereas girls withdraw more in groups.

作者信息

Benenson Joyce F, Heath Anna

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar;42(2):272-82. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272.

DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272
PMID:16569166
Abstract

Past research predicts that males will be more likely to withdraw in one-on-one interactions versus groups, whereas females will be more likely to withdraw in groups than in one-on-one interactions. Ninety-eight 10-year-old children engaged in a word generation task either in same-sex dyads or in groups. Boys completed significantly more words in groups than in dyads, whereas girls' performance was similar in the 2 social structures. Confirming the hypothesis, analyses of the dynamics of dyads and groups using time spent writing as a measure of effort demonstrated that boys withdrew more than girls in dyads, whereas girls withdrew more than boys in groups. Furthermore, in groups, girls were more likely than boys to focus on one individual. Causal explanations for sex differences in preferences for differing social structures are proposed.

摘要

以往的研究预测,在一对一互动中,男性比在群体中更有可能退出;而在群体中,女性比在一对一互动中更有可能退出。98名10岁儿童在同性二元组或群体中进行单词生成任务。男孩在群体中完成的单词明显多于在二元组中,而女孩在两种社会结构中的表现相似。使用写作时间作为努力程度的衡量标准,对二元组和群体动态的分析证实了这一假设,即男孩在二元组中比女孩退出得更多,而女孩在群体中比男孩退出得更多。此外,在群体中,女孩比男孩更有可能专注于某一个体。文中还提出了对不同社会结构偏好中性别差异的因果解释。

相似文献

1
Boys withdraw more in one-on-one interactions, whereas girls withdraw more in groups.男孩在一对一互动中更倾向于退缩,而女孩在群体中更倾向于退缩。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar;42(2):272-82. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272.
2
Gender similarities and differences in children's social behavior: finding personality in contextualized patterns of adaptation.儿童社会行为中的性别异同:在情境化适应模式中探寻个性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):844-55. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.844.
3
Childhood disruptive behaviors and family functioning in clinically referred children: are girls different from boys?临床转诊儿童的童年破坏性行为与家庭功能:女孩与男孩有差异吗?
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Oct;48(5):375-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00617.x.
4
Is there a relationship between overweight and obesity and mental health problems in 4- to 5-year-old Australian children?澳大利亚4至5岁儿童的超重及肥胖与心理健康问题之间存在关联吗?
Ambul Pediatr. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):306-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.08.005.
5
Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork.数学成绩中的性别差异:儿童对待学业方式的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):11-26. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11.
6
Patterns in sedentary and exercise behaviors and associations with overweight in 9-14-year-old boys and girls--a cross-sectional study.9至14岁男孩和女孩的久坐及运动行为模式及其与超重的关联——一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jan 31;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-16.
7
An observational study of social exclusion under varied conditions: gender and developmental differences.
Child Dev. 2004 Sep-Oct;75(5):1538-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00756.x.
8
Telling stories: gender differences in peers' emotion talk and communication style.讲述故事:同伴情感谈话和交流风格中的性别差异。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):707-21. doi: 10.1348/2044-835X.002003. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
9
Boys affiliate more than girls with a familiar same-sex peer.男孩比女孩更容易与熟悉的同性同伴产生亲密关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Dec;113(4):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
10
The stability and consequences of young children's same-sex peer interactions.幼儿同性同伴互动的稳定性及影响
Dev Psychol. 2001 May;37(3):431-46.

引用本文的文献

1
New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.关于女性合作进化的新视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210424. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0424. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
Social anxiety is associated with poorer peer functioning for girls but not boys with ADHD.社交焦虑与 ADHD 女孩的同伴功能较差有关,但与 ADHD 男孩无关。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Nov;281:112524. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112524. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
Exploring the links between dispositions, romantic relationships, support networks and community inclusion in men and women.
探索男性和女性中的性格、浪漫关系、支持网络和社区融入之间的联系。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216210. eCollection 2019.
4
Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking.女性青睐二元关系,而男性更喜欢俱乐部:来自社交网络的跨文化证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0118329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118329. eCollection 2015.
5
The development of human female competition: allies and adversaries.人类女性竞争的发展:盟友与对手。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 28;368(1631):20130079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0079. Print 2013.
6
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.社会排斥:对女性人类比男性更重要。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055851. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Relational victimization predicts children's social-cognitive and self-regulatory responses in a challenging peer context.关系型受害经历预示着儿童在具有挑战性的同伴情境中的社会认知和自我调节反应。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Sep;45(5):1444-54. doi: 10.1037/a0014858.