Brodowicz Thomas, Krzakowski Maciej, Zwitter Matjaz, Tzekova Valentina, Ramlau Rodryg, Ghilezan Nicolae, Ciuleanu Tudor, Cucevic Branka, Gyurkovits Kalman, Ulsperger Ernst, Jassem Jacek, Grgic Mislav, Saip Pinar, Szilasi Maria, Wiltschke Christoph, Wagnerova Maria, Oskina Natalya, Soldatenkova Victoria, Zielinski Christoph, Wenczl Miklos
Medical University Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Lung Cancer. 2006 May;52(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
The primary objective of this randomized phase III study was to show significant difference in median time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent gemcitabine maintenance therapy versus best supportive care following gemcitabine plus cisplatin initial first-line therapy.
Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days. Patients achieving objective response or disease stabilization following initial gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy were randomized (2:1 fashion) to receive maintenance gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) plus best supportive care (GEM arm), or best supportive care only (BSC arm).
Between November 1999 and November 2002, we enrolled 352 patients (median age: 57 years; stage IV disease: 74%; Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >80: 41%). Following initial therapy, 206 patients were randomized and treated with gemcitabine (138) or best supportive care (68). TTP throughout the study period was 6.6 and 5 months for GEM and BSC arms, respectively, while values for the maintenance period were 3.6 and 2.0 months (for p < 0.001 for both). Median overall survival (OS) throughout study was 13.0 months for GEM and 11.0 months for BSC arms (p = 0.195). The toxicity profile was mild, with neutropenia being most common grade 3/4 toxicities.
Maintenance therapy with gemcitabine, following initial therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, was feasible, and produced significantly longer TTP compared to best supportive care alone. Further studies are warranted to establish the place of maintenance chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.
本随机III期研究的主要目的是表明,在接受吉西他滨单药维持治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者与接受吉西他滨加顺铂一线初始治疗后给予最佳支持治疗的患者中,中位疾病进展时间(TTP)存在显著差异。
初治的IIIB/IV期NSCLC患者接受吉西他滨1250mg/m²(第1天和第8天)加顺铂80mg/m²(第1天),每21天一次。在初始吉西他滨加顺铂治疗后达到客观缓解或疾病稳定的患者被随机分组(2:1方式),接受维持吉西他滨(每21天第1天和第8天1250mg/m²)加最佳支持治疗(吉西他滨组),或仅接受最佳支持治疗(最佳支持治疗组)。
在1999年11月至2002年11月期间,我们纳入了352例患者(中位年龄:57岁;IV期疾病:74%;卡诺夫斯基体能状态(KPS)>80:41%)。初始治疗后,206例患者被随机分组,接受吉西他滨治疗(138例)或最佳支持治疗(68例)。在整个研究期间,吉西他滨组和最佳支持治疗组的TTP分别为6.6个月和5个月,而维持期的值分别为3.6个月和2.0个月(两者p均<0.001)。整个研究期间,吉西他滨组的中位总生存期(OS)为13.个月,最佳支持治疗组为11.0个月(p = 0.195)。毒性特征较轻,中性粒细胞减少是最常见的3/4级毒性。
在吉西他滨加顺铂初始治疗后,用吉西他滨进行维持治疗是可行的,与单独最佳支持治疗相比,可显著延长TTP。有必要进行进一步研究以确定维持化疗在晚期NSCLC患者中的地位。