• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助检测乳腺癌:一项成本效益研究。

Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.

作者信息

Lindfors Karen K, McGahan Michele C, Rosenquist C John, Hurlock Gregory S

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Suite 3100, 4860 Y St, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):710-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050670. Epub 2006 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2392050670
PMID:16569787
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the cost-effectiveness of adding computer-aided detection (CAD) to a screening mammography program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare three hypothetical groups of women aged 40-79 years. The first group was composed of women undergoing mammographic screening without CAD; the second, of women undergoing mammographic screening with CAD; and the third, of women undergoing observation without screening. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the marginal cost per year of life saved (MCYLS). MCYLS was calculated for screening mammography with CAD compared with screening mammography alone and for screening mammography alone compared with observation. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the cost of CAD, the rates of cancer detection with CAD, and the stage distribution of breast cancers diagnosed with CAD.

RESULTS

Adding CAD to a mammographic screening program resulted in a MCYLS of $19,058. The MCYLS of screening mammography alone compared with observation was $16,023. CAD increases the marginal effectiveness of screening by 29%; however, the marginal cost of screening is also increased by 34%. Varying the cost of CAD yields a linear increase in MCYLS from $8937 with CAD at $9 per case to $24,924 with CAD at $25 per case. The cost-effectiveness of CAD is dependent on the magnitude of the increase in cancer detection rates with CAD but is also affected by the stage distribution of cancers diagnosed with CAD.

CONCLUSION

The MCYLS is 19% greater for CAD added to screening versus screening mammography alone but is still within the accepted range for cost-effectiveness.

摘要

目的

分析在乳腺钼靶筛查项目中添加计算机辅助检测(CAD)的成本效益。

材料与方法

建立马尔可夫模型,比较三组年龄在40 - 79岁的假设女性群体。第一组由接受无CAD乳腺钼靶筛查的女性组成;第二组由接受有CAD乳腺钼靶筛查的女性组成;第三组由接受观察而非筛查的女性组成。成本效益表示为每挽救一年生命的边际成本(MCYLS)。计算了与单独乳腺钼靶筛查相比,添加CAD的乳腺钼靶筛查的MCYLS,以及与观察相比,单独乳腺钼靶筛查的MCYLS。通过改变CAD的成本、CAD的癌症检测率以及CAD诊断的乳腺癌的分期分布进行敏感性分析。

结果

在乳腺钼靶筛查项目中添加CAD导致MCYLS为19,058美元。与观察相比,单独乳腺钼靶筛查的MCYLS为16,023美元。CAD使筛查的边际效果提高了29%;然而,筛查的边际成本也增加了34%。改变CAD的成本会使MCYLS呈线性增加,从每例CAD成本为9美元时的8937美元增加到每例CAD成本为25美元时的24,924美元。CAD的成本效益取决于CAD使癌症检测率增加的幅度,但也受到CAD诊断的癌症的分期分布的影响。

结论

与单独乳腺钼靶筛查相比,在筛查中添加CAD的MCYLS高出19%,但仍在可接受的成本效益范围内。

相似文献

1
Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.计算机辅助检测乳腺癌:一项成本效益研究。
Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):710-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050670. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
2
The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.乳腺钼靶筛查策略的成本效益
JAMA. 1995 Sep 20;274(11):881-4.
3
Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.发展中国家的乳腺癌筛查政策:印度的成本效益分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn292. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.40-49岁女性的乳腺钼靶筛查:成本效益分析
Radiology. 1994 Jun;191(3):647-50. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.3.8184041.
5
Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.计算机辅助检测对CT结肠成像成本效益的影响。
Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):488-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080685.
6
Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness.乳腺钼靶引导下的针芯活检:成本效益研究
Radiology. 1994 Jan;190(1):217-22. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259408.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析:双读片与单读片 + 计算机辅助检测读片对比
Breast Cancer. 2014 Sep;21(5):532-41. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0423-5. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
8
Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women.伊朗低社会经济群体女性乳腺癌钼靶筛查的成本效益
Arch Iran Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):241-5.
9
Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost.综合乳腺癌筛查项目中的临床乳腺检查:贡献与成本
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):650-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2403051377.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.从瑞士法定医疗保健角度对质量控制的乳腺钼靶筛查计划进行成本效益分析:对最具影响力因素的定量评估。
Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):42-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00143.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of the current state of the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer diagnosis.乳腺癌诊断的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统现状综述。
Open Life Sci. 2022 Dec 9;17(1):1600-1611. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0517. eCollection 2022.
2
Utilization and Cost of Mammography Screening Among Commercially Insured Women 50 to 64 Years of Age in the United States, 2012-2016.美国 2012-2016 年商业保险女性 50-64 岁人群的乳腺 X 线筛查利用情况和成本。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;29(3):327-337. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7543. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
数字乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成中簇状微钙化的计算机辅助检测技术及信号特征分析
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 7;61(19):7092-7112. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/7092. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population.数字化乳腺断层合成技术在美国商业保险人群中用于乳腺癌筛查的价值分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jan 12;7:53-63. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S76167. eCollection 2015.
5
What is the optimal threshold at which to recommend breast biopsy?推荐行乳房活检的最佳阈值是多少?
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048820. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
6
The costs of breast cancer in a Mexican public health institution.墨西哥公立医疗机构乳腺癌的成本。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2008;1:15-21. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S4500. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
7
Computer-aided detection of breast cancer - have all bases been covered?乳腺癌的计算机辅助检测——所有方面都已涵盖了吗?
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2008;2:5-9. doi: 10.4137/bcbcr.s785. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.计算机辅助检测(CAD)在乳腺 X 线筛查中是否具有成本效益?基于 CADET II 研究的模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 17;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11.