Maurer Walter G, Hebert Christopher J
Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Cleve Clin J Med. 2006 Mar;73 Suppl 1:S30-5. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.73.suppl_1.s30.
Change is inevitable, but participation is optional. An array of quality measures is being used by various government entities, health care purchasers and payers, and other groups. Many of the quality-measurement initiatives have not only gained the attention of large employers, but are also beginning to pique the public's interest. Novel approaches to measuring and rewarding quality are also emerging, such as pay-for-performance schemes and the use of APR-DRGs. Health care organizations that participate in the quality-measurement process and provide input will benefit by the type of measures that are ultimately created. It is much better to be part of the development process than to have insurer- or employer-designed quality measures imposed on your institution. At the very least, health care organizations would be wise to serve as watchdogs to ensure that currently proposed quality measures truly measure high-quality care.
变化不可避免,但参与是可选择的。各类政府实体、医疗保健购买方和支付方以及其他团体正在使用一系列质量衡量标准。许多质量衡量举措不仅引起了大型雇主的关注,也开始激发公众的兴趣。衡量和奖励质量的新方法也在不断涌现,比如绩效薪酬方案以及使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评价系统(APR - DRGs)。参与质量衡量过程并提供意见的医疗保健组织将从最终制定的衡量标准类型中受益。参与制定过程远比让保险公司或雇主设计的质量衡量标准强加于自身机构要好得多。至少,医疗保健组织明智的做法是充当监督者,以确保当前提议的质量衡量标准真正衡量的是高质量护理。