Suppr超能文献

质量评估:谁在衡量结果,又告知了患者什么?

Quality measurement: who is measuring outcomes and what are patients being told?

作者信息

Maurer Walter G, Hebert Christopher J

机构信息

Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Cleve Clin J Med. 2006 Mar;73 Suppl 1:S30-5. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.73.suppl_1.s30.

Abstract

Change is inevitable, but participation is optional. An array of quality measures is being used by various government entities, health care purchasers and payers, and other groups. Many of the quality-measurement initiatives have not only gained the attention of large employers, but are also beginning to pique the public's interest. Novel approaches to measuring and rewarding quality are also emerging, such as pay-for-performance schemes and the use of APR-DRGs. Health care organizations that participate in the quality-measurement process and provide input will benefit by the type of measures that are ultimately created. It is much better to be part of the development process than to have insurer- or employer-designed quality measures imposed on your institution. At the very least, health care organizations would be wise to serve as watchdogs to ensure that currently proposed quality measures truly measure high-quality care.

摘要

变化不可避免,但参与是可选择的。各类政府实体、医疗保健购买方和支付方以及其他团体正在使用一系列质量衡量标准。许多质量衡量举措不仅引起了大型雇主的关注,也开始激发公众的兴趣。衡量和奖励质量的新方法也在不断涌现,比如绩效薪酬方案以及使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评价系统(APR - DRGs)。参与质量衡量过程并提供意见的医疗保健组织将从最终制定的衡量标准类型中受益。参与制定过程远比让保险公司或雇主设计的质量衡量标准强加于自身机构要好得多。至少,医疗保健组织明智的做法是充当监督者,以确保当前提议的质量衡量标准真正衡量的是高质量护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验