• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿巴拉契亚地区急性医疗服务临床过程指标分析:罗恩医疗中心的经验

An analysis of clinical process measures for acute healthcare delivery in Appalachia: the Roane Medical Center experience.

作者信息

Pope Karla Rae, Hancock John S, Sills Eric Scott

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Matthew's University College of Medicine, Grand Cayman, British West Indies.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Mar 29;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-3.

DOI:10.1186/1478-4505-4-3
PMID:16571127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1440865/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To survey management of selected emergency healthcare needs in a Tennessee community hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this descriptive report, discharges and associated standard process measures were retrospectively studied for Roane Medical Center (RMC) in Harriman, Tennessee (pop. 6,757). Hospital data were extracted from a nationwide database of short-term acute care hospitals to measure 16 quality performance measures in myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and pneumonia during the 14 month interval ending March 2005. The data also permitted comparisons with state and national reference groups.

RESULTS

Of RMC patients with myocardial infarction (MI), 94% received aspirin on arrival, a figure higher than both state (85%) and national (91%) averages. Assessment of left ventricular dysfunction among heart failure patients was also higher at RMC (98%) than the state (74%) or national (79%) average. For RMC pneumonia patients, 79% received antibiotics within 4 h of admission, which compared favorably with State (76%) and national (75%) average. RMC scored higher on 13 of 16 clinical process measures (p<0.01, sign test analysis, >95% CI) compared to state and national averages.

DISCUSSION

Although acute health care needs are often met with limited resources in medically underserved regions, RMC performed above state and national average for most process measures assessed in this review. Our data were derived from one facility and the associated findings may not be applicable in other healthcare settings. Further studies are planned to track other parameters and specific clinical outcomes at RMC, as well as to identify specific institutional policies that facilitate attainment of target quality measures.

摘要

目的

调查田纳西州一家社区医院对特定紧急医疗需求的管理情况。

材料与方法

在这份描述性报告中,对田纳西州哈里曼市罗阿讷医疗中心(RMC)(人口6,757)的出院情况及相关标准流程指标进行了回顾性研究。从全国短期急性护理医院数据库中提取医院数据,以衡量截至2005年3月的14个月期间心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭和肺炎的16项质量绩效指标。这些数据还允许与州和全国参考组进行比较。

结果

罗阿讷医疗中心心肌梗死(MI)患者中,94%在入院时接受了阿司匹林治疗,这一数字高于州平均水平(85%)和全国平均水平(91%)。罗阿讷医疗中心对心力衰竭患者左心室功能障碍的评估也高于州平均水平(74%)和全国平均水平(79%),为98%。对于罗阿讷医疗中心的肺炎患者,79%在入院后4小时内接受了抗生素治疗,与州平均水平(76%)和全国平均水平(75%)相比具有优势。与州和全国平均水平相比,罗阿讷医疗中心在16项临床流程指标中的13项上得分更高(p<0.01,符号检验分析,>95%置信区间)。

讨论

尽管在医疗服务不足的地区,急性医疗需求往往在资源有限的情况下得到满足,但罗阿讷医疗中心在本次审查评估的大多数流程指标上表现高于州和全国平均水平。我们的数据来自一个机构,相关发现可能不适用于其他医疗环境。计划进一步开展研究,以跟踪罗阿讷医疗中心的其他参数和特定临床结果,并确定有助于实现目标质量指标的具体机构政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6b62cb96783e/1478-4505-4-3-16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/f6edd49ac09d/1478-4505-4-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6a99d6468c59/1478-4505-4-3-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/4c491da6eab3/1478-4505-4-3-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/32a421aa541e/1478-4505-4-3-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/889d7dd6499e/1478-4505-4-3-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e617b6a5d5ce/1478-4505-4-3-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/0501cae003b7/1478-4505-4-3-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/b67d330bcd53/1478-4505-4-3-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e9e79907c6fd/1478-4505-4-3-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/eb2fe5492219/1478-4505-4-3-10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e5ad76a5a908/1478-4505-4-3-11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/2e9923be54f9/1478-4505-4-3-12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/b1a03636a0d1/1478-4505-4-3-13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6d5077d90460/1478-4505-4-3-14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/5f783863f797/1478-4505-4-3-15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6b62cb96783e/1478-4505-4-3-16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/f6edd49ac09d/1478-4505-4-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6a99d6468c59/1478-4505-4-3-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/4c491da6eab3/1478-4505-4-3-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/32a421aa541e/1478-4505-4-3-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/889d7dd6499e/1478-4505-4-3-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e617b6a5d5ce/1478-4505-4-3-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/0501cae003b7/1478-4505-4-3-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/b67d330bcd53/1478-4505-4-3-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e9e79907c6fd/1478-4505-4-3-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/eb2fe5492219/1478-4505-4-3-10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/e5ad76a5a908/1478-4505-4-3-11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/2e9923be54f9/1478-4505-4-3-12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/b1a03636a0d1/1478-4505-4-3-13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6d5077d90460/1478-4505-4-3-14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/5f783863f797/1478-4505-4-3-15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d50e/1440865/6b62cb96783e/1478-4505-4-3-16.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of clinical process measures for acute healthcare delivery in Appalachia: the Roane Medical Center experience.阿巴拉契亚地区急性医疗服务临床过程指标分析:罗恩医疗中心的经验
Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Mar 29;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-3.
2
A decade of health assessments in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区十年的健康评估。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 May 8;30(4):312-318. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0064.
3
Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Surveillance - four states, 2005-2007.保罗·科弗代尔国家急性卒中登记监测——四个州,2005 - 2007年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009 Nov 6;58(7):1-23.
4
Standard admission orders can improve the management of acute myocardial infarction.标准入院医嘱可以改善急性心肌梗死的管理。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):425-32. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs022. Epub 2012 May 16.
5
Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality.急性心肌梗死的医院质量:过程指标之间的相关性以及与短期死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Jul 5;296(1):72-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.1.72.
6
Quality of care in U.S. hospitals as reflected by standardized measures, 2002-2004.2002 - 2004年美国医院标准化指标所反映的医疗质量
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):255-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa043778.
7
The association between emergency department crowding and hospital performance on antibiotic timing for pneumonia and percutaneous intervention for myocardial infarction.急诊科拥挤与医院在肺炎抗生素使用时机及心肌梗死经皮介入治疗方面的表现之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):873-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.03.568. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
8
Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的绩效薪酬、医疗质量与治疗结果
JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2373-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.21.2373.
9
The effect of cardiovascular credentialed pharmacists on process measures and outcomes in myocardial infarction and heart failure.具有心血管专业资质的药剂师对心肌梗死和心力衰竭的过程指标及结局的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Aug;34(8):803-8. doi: 10.1002/phar.1444. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
10
Management of acute myocardial infarction. Do we follow guidelines applied in practice?
Saudi Med J. 2003 Nov;24(11):1234-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.美国医院的护理——医院质量联盟计划。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):265-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051249.
2
Threats to rural surgery.农村外科面临的威胁。
Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.012.
3
The dual enrolled as a disadvantaged population: developing culturally informed interventions for Tennessee Medicare/Medicaid women.双重注册的弱势群体:为田纳西州医疗保险/医疗补助女性制定具有文化适应性的干预措施。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2003 Winter;26(3):269-97.
4
Strategy development in small hospitals: stakeholder management in constrained circumstances.小型医院的战略制定:受限环境下的利益相关者管理
Health Care Manage Rev. 2004 Jul-Sep;29(3):218-28. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200407000-00007.
5
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.美国为成年人提供的医疗保健质量。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
6
National and state trends in quality of care for acute myocardial infarction between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999: the medicare health care quality improvement program.1994 - 1995年至1998 - 1999年间急性心肌梗死护理质量的全国及各州趋势:医疗保险医疗质量改进计划
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 23;163(12):1430-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1430.
7
Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: summary from the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.急性心肌梗死护理质量量化中的挑战与机遇:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会心血管疾病与中风护理质量及结局研究首届科学论坛急性心肌梗死工作组总结
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 7;41(9):1653-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00415-7.
8
Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001.1998 - 1999年至2000 - 2001年期间为医疗保险受益人提供的护理质量变化。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 15;289(3):305-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.3.305.
9
Large employers' new strategies in health care.大型雇主在医疗保健方面的新策略。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):939-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb012850.
10
Rural hospitals: trends, challenges, and a future research and policy analysis agenda.农村医院:趋势、挑战以及未来研究与政策分析议程
J Rural Health. 2002;18 Suppl:197-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00931.x.