Suppr超能文献

胃癌健康状况的效用值:一项系统评价

Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Gonzalez Cristian, Espinoza Manuel, Libuy Matías, Crispi Francisca, Riquelme Arnoldo, Alarid-Escudero Fernando, Latorre Gonzalo, Pizarro Margarita, Cuadrado Cristóbal

机构信息

Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile.

Departamento Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile; Centro de Prevención y Control de Cáncer (CECAN), Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Mar;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101063. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Gastric cancer (GC) imposes a significant burden of disease globally. Multiple treatments are available but are associated with high costs and potentially detrimental effects on quality of life. The utility values of health status are measures of patient preference over quality of life, which are increasingly used for health and economic decision-making. Currently, there is little systematized information on the utility values for different stages of GC. This systematic review synthesizes and meta-analyses the literature on GC utilities.

METHODS

A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting utility values calculated using direct and indirect methods. Information from the selected studies was extracted and appraised, and meta-analyses of utility values based on GC health states were performed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 4585 patients were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimates showed a mean utility of 0.77 (95% CI 0.7-0.85) for stage I, 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85) for stage II, 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.96) for stage III, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.32) for stage IV. All estimates showed considerable heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an updated overview of the literature on utility values in GC and presents a discussion of the relevance of GC stages for its analysis. Decision-makers should consider patients' preferences in the proposal of policies and clinical decisions.

摘要

目的

胃癌在全球造成了重大的疾病负担。有多种治疗方法可供选择,但这些方法成本高昂,且可能对生活质量产生不利影响。健康状况的效用值是衡量患者对生活质量偏好的指标,越来越多地用于健康和经济决策。目前,关于不同阶段胃癌效用值的系统信息很少。本系统评价综合并荟萃分析了有关胃癌效用值的文献。

方法

在PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆中进行检索,以查找报告使用直接和间接方法计算的效用值的研究。提取并评估所选研究的信息,并基于胃癌健康状态对效用值进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了12项研究,涉及4585名患者。随机效应荟萃分析估计显示,I期的平均效用值为0.77(95%置信区间0.7 - 0.85),II期为0.75(95%置信区间0.65 - 0.85),III期为0.70(95%置信区间0.63 - 0.96),IV期为0.64(95%置信区间0.56 - 0.32)。所有估计值均显示出相当大的异质性。

结论

我们的研究提供了关于胃癌效用值文献的最新综述,并讨论了胃癌分期在其分析中的相关性。决策者在制定政策和临床决策时应考虑患者的偏好。

相似文献

1
Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Mar;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101063. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-related quality of life.
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E830-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11337.x. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01784-6.
2
Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in measuring the HRQoL burden of 4 health conditions in China.
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Mar;24(2):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01465-7. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
Evaluating health-related quality of life in gastric cancer patients in Suzhou, China.
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;10(7):8024-8033. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1599.
6
Health state utility values by cancer stage: a systematic literature review.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Nov;22(8):1275-1288. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01335-8. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
9
A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 14;10(20):10916-10921. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6747. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Health State Utility Values in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1256-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验